deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Simulations_My_other_major__.tex b/section_Simulations_My_other_major__.tex  index 916b4b1..5eadf02 100644  --- a/section_Simulations_My_other_major__.tex  +++ b/section_Simulations_My_other_major__.tex 
...
There is an alternative potential justification for both E$^{400}$ and E$^{560}$, which is that they version of a stabilisation scenario. I didn't immediately spot any runs in ScenarioMIP looking at determining what our target CO$_2$ should be on the longer term. Nonetheless, I'd hestitate to include them in PlioMIP2 with that solely justification and feel they would sit better elsewhere. It would appear that you need E$^{400}$ for the factorisation however. If you include that run, please talk to some folks involved in ScenarioMIP and try to get it used from both perspectives.  Despite all these negative comments about the scenario choices, you're surely along the correct lines. You may want to instead include have  Eoi$^{350}$ and Eoi$^{450}$ in as a Tier 1, that spans both  the Pliocene for Future section [along with Eio$^{400}_{4xCO_2}$], past and future elements,  as I feel the CO$_2$ uncertainty is pretty important to examine. examine for both. This would mean that the Pliocene for Future section consists solely of Eio$^{400}_{4xCO_2}$.  My recommended groupings would:  \begin{table}