deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Line_by_Line_comments__.tex b/section_Line_by_Line_comments__.tex  index 6d615e6..82d9c55 100644  --- a/section_Line_by_Line_comments__.tex  +++ b/section_Line_by_Line_comments__.tex 
...
\item[P4009, L12] I know all citations definitely state that temporal uncertainty as important, but do they actually address the issue fully. I remember seeing simulations for different orbital conditions at meetings to elaborate this issue, but are they in the cited references?  \item[P4009, L17] This statement seems rather strongly worded as written, especially as it comes without references or examples. You may be able to find some corroboration for it from the PIGS/QUIGS work.  \item[P4009, L29] You may want to rephrase this sentence. I understand that you've saying the date of 3.205Ma may be revised. But would the orbital configuration associated with KM5c alter. If so, then is the justification for the time-slice invalid? Was this not addressed elsewhere \cite{Haywood_2013}?  \item[P4010, L12] I think this needs either further explanation or a reference.  \item[P4010, L15] Capitalisation of Future  \item[P4010, L16] I agree with you about the importance of understanding future, but this wasn't mentioned as an objective for PlioMIP1 in the list earlier.  \end{description}