this is for holding javascript data
Jan Jensen edited subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 9e4b24477a9b99ef0bd96b8a613a7d0f2016a3c2
deletions | additions
diff --git a/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex b/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
index f0d0966..70b3622 100644
--- a/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
+++ b/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
...
\subsection{Benchmarking ProCS against full QM calculations}
Eq (1) is parameterized using OPBE/6-31G(d,p)//PM6-D3H+ calculations so we compare ProCS against full OPBE/6-31G(d,p)//PM6-D3H+ calculations on ubiquitin (1UBQ) and protein G (2OED) to test for errors introduced by the inherent additivity assumptions and the structural simplifications in the model systems used for the DFT calculations. The results are summarized in Table
\ref{tab:vsqm}. \ref{table:vsqm}. The first row, marked "all", summarize results for ProCS if all but the last two terms of Eq 1 are included. The last two terms correct for the use of PM6-D3H+ as the structural model and explicit solvent effects, respectively and are thus not relevant when comparing to DFT calculations using PM6-D3H+ optimized geometries.