this is for holding javascript data
Jan Jensen edited subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 857fb6ba05474918d7cffae93b6c5d1ccd57abdf
deletions | additions
diff --git a/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex b/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
index 319b8ab..ab15817 100644
--- a/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
+++ b/subsection_Benchmarking_ProCS_against_full__.tex
...
\subsection{Benchmarking ProCS against full QM calculations}
Eq (1) is parameterized using OPBE/6-31G(d,p)//PM6-D3H+ calculations so we compare ProCS against full OPBE/6-31G(d,p)//PM6-D3H+ calculations on ubiquitin (1UBQ) and protein G (2OED) to test for errors introduced by the inherent additivity assumptions and the structural simplifications in the model systems used for the DFT calculations. The results are summarized in Table
1. \ref{tab:vsqm}. The first row, marked "all", summarize results for ProCS if all but the last two terms of Eq 1 are included. The last two terms correct for the use of PM6-D3H+ as the structural model and explicit solvent effects, respectively and are thus not relevant when comparing to DFT calculations using PM6-D3H+ optimized geometries.