Jan Jensen edited textbf_Table_1_Comparison_of__.tex  almost 9 years ago

Commit id: 3b648a094aa59ecfabbc89c6fe6d097e2fe4f5d3

deletions | additions      

       

\textbf{Table 1}. Comparison of ProCS//PM6-D3H+ and OPBE/6-31G(d,p)//PM6-D3H+ chemical shielding values for 1UBQ and 2OED. The row marked "all" refers to predictions using the first X terms of Eq (1). The row marked $\Delta \sigma_{BB}^{i-1}$ refers to predictions where this terms has been excluded and similarly for the next six rows. The last row, marked ProCS15, refers to the optimum combination of terms for each atoms as a summarized in Table 2 and described further in the text. See Section 4.5 for details of the statistical analysis.  \begin{center}  \begin{table}  \label {tab:vsqm}  \begin{center}  \begin{tabular}{ c c c c c c c }  \hline  & CA & CB & C & HA & H & N \\ \hline 

ProCS15 & 1.6 (0.84) & 1.8 (0.71) & 2.3 (0.63) & 0.5 (0.90) & 0.6 (0.91) & 2.7 (0.92) \\  \hline  \end{tabular}  \caption{A beautiful caption here} \end{center}  \caption{  Comparison of ProCS//PM6-D3H+ and OPBE/6-31G(d,p)//PM6-D3H+ chemical shielding values for 1UBQ and 2OED. The row marked "all" refers to predictions using the first X terms of Eq (1). The row marked $\Delta \sigma_{BB}^{i-1}$ refers to predictions where this terms has been excluded and similarly for the next six rows. The last row, marked ProCS15, refers to the optimum combination of terms for each atoms as a summarized in Table 2 and described further in the text. See Section 4.5 for details of the statistical analysis  }  \end{table}  \end{center}