deletions | additions       diff --git a/MAYBE_REMOVE_NEXT_PARAGRAPH_AND__.tex b/MAYBE_REMOVE_NEXT_PARAGRAPH_AND__.tex  index 14661ab..fafe1ea 100644  --- a/MAYBE_REMOVE_NEXT_PARAGRAPH_AND__.tex  +++ b/MAYBE_REMOVE_NEXT_PARAGRAPH_AND__.tex 
...
In Fig. 2 we show the %power ratio between dipole and radial modes (the  dipole mode visibility for about 3600 red giants observed over the first   37 months of the {\it Kepler} mission. Our analysis is restricted to a sample of stars with \numax\   larger than 50\muhz\ and masses below 2.1\msol, which from theory in absence of observational uncertainties  is expected to include onlyhydrogen burning  red giants\citep{Stello_2013}.  %burning  that have not started burning helium in their cores \citep{Stello_2013}. %MC: Changed next sentence.   We %DS: You cant make direct refs in Nature (references cant be part of the text).  %We  cross matched our sample with the data of \citet{Stello_2013} and \citet{Mosser_2014}, which allowed us to identify and remove a few evolved stars burning helium in their cores ($2\%$ of our sample, almost all with \numax < 70 \muhz). %We We  cross matched our sample with those of known helium burning stars \citep{Stello_2013,Mosser_2014}, which allowed us to identify and remove a small fraction evolved stars burning helium that due  to measurement uncertainty had entered our sample ($2\%$ of our sample, almost all with \numax < 70 \muhz).  %to  %remove helium burning stars that due to measurement uncertainties in \numax\ and mass had remained in our %sample. The two percent of helium burning stars that we found, and of which almost all %(70 out of 80) %had \numax\ below 70\muhz, were subsequently removed from our sample.   %The missing dipole modes in a significant fraction of stars revented us using