deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Disclaimer_As_chief_scientist__.tex b/section_Disclaimer_As_chief_scientist__.tex  index a47b51a..d2ba9fc 100644  --- a/section_Disclaimer_As_chief_scientist__.tex  +++ b/section_Disclaimer_As_chief_scientist__.tex 
...
\section{Disclaimer}  As chief scientist at Authorea, I am obviously a biased party. This said I am an active researcher and I've been writing papers for several years. I wrote papers in LaTeX, with and without bibtex, sending tens I used various reference formatting systems (e.g. bibtex), I sent hundreds  of draft  revisions as tar files attachments  via email (sic), having the paper version-controlled with cvs I set up svn  and svn. And of course I've been using Authorea. cvs repositories to version-control my papers.  I published papers articles written  in collaborations ranging from 1 to 42 co-authors. I know from first-hand experience that the pain can be real and I am truly interested in sharing with colleagues my experience on the pros and cons of the different approaches.