Matteo Cantiello edited Intro.tex  about 10 years ago

Commit id: a422d38834320c3010e74d9ded9e47f83f9dec42

deletions | additions      

       

The wealth of data provided by Kepler has revealed an astonishing fact: there is average one planet orbiting every star in the Universe \citep{2013ApJ...764..105S,2012Natur.481..167C}. Just in our Galaxy this means we have 100 billions planets. Since we have about 100 billion galaxies in the Universe, there are about 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 =$10^{22}$ planets out there. To put it in the words of W. Borucki, Principal Investigator of the KEPLER satellite: "When you wish upon a star, you are wishing upon a star with planets".    This is fascinating, but still it does not tell much about the likelihood of extraterrestrial life. Planets like Jupiter or Mercury are not expected to host life due to their extreme surface conditions. This could well be the rule in the Universe, with Earth being just a lucky shot of nature. Something that only happened, say\... once?  How The question is then how  common are planets that can likely support biological life as we know it? life.  A possible requirement is having a rocky planet in the so called Goldilocks or habitable zone, a range of distances from the host star where surface temperatures are just about right for liquid water to be present. This might well be a restrictive definition of habitability, as life forms might thrive in very different environments from what we are used to. But one has to start somewhere, and liquid water seems to have played a decisive role as a catalyst for biological life on Earth.   And here is where it gets very interesting, as just recently we learned that Earth-like planets are indeed very common. Statistically speaking 1 in 5 planets around Sun-like stars could potentially support life \cite{Petigura_Howard_Marcy_2013}. And Sun-like stars are extremely common, resulting in about 10 billion of habitable planets just in the Galaxy and the closest to us potentially within 12 light years.\\ %$n_e \approx$ 0.2