Matteo Cantiello edited Segue.tex  about 9 years ago

Commit id: f3175545cdaa7aad10511877e478b4bb3c726733

deletions | additions      

       

These failures seem to highlight two major requirements for a healthy peer review system.  \begin{enumerate}  \item More scholars should participate in the peer review of an article. The collective expertise of a community appears as the natural way to expedite and improve the quality of peer review.   \item The peer review should be done in the open by researchers. This is the only way to ensure that no third parties can control or corrupt the process. The Wikipedia model shows this is a viable solution.  \end{enumerate}