deletions | additions       diff --git a/Einstein_published_in_1916_a__.tex b/Einstein_published_in_1916_a__.tex  index 53363c1..ce8793f 100644  --- a/Einstein_published_in_1916_a__.tex  +++ b/Einstein_published_in_1916_a__.tex 
...
This fundamental result was packaged into a PDF, a static format that does not allow the reader to access and interact with some of the most important elements of the research: data and code. Fortunately, these were released shortly afterwards by the \href{https://losc.ligo.org/events/GW150914/}{LIGO Open Science Center} as a Jupyter notebook. But why the paper and the Jupyter notebook have been published separately?   It's \textbf{It's  clear that the PDF, which is unable to contain and execute data and code, can not be the format of choice for the paper of the future. future.}  On the other hand Authorea papers, being web-native, can easily include data and code, allowing readers to interact with the research as they go through the paper. To demonstrate this point, we included in this article the signal processing tasks on strain time-series data associated with the LIGO GW150914 data release. Click on the 'Launch iPython' button icon in the figure below to access, modify and run the data analysis used to produce this figure and the other results published in \citet{PhysRevLett.116.061102}.