deletions | additions       diff --git a/This_fundamental_result_was_packaged__.tex b/This_fundamental_result_was_packaged__.tex  index eb732ab..aaa41ed 100644  --- a/This_fundamental_result_was_packaged__.tex  +++ b/This_fundamental_result_was_packaged__.tex 
...
This fundamental result was packaged into a PDF, a static format that does not allow the reader to access and interact with some of the most important elements of the research: data and code. Fortunately, these were released shortly afterwards by the \href{https://losc.ligo.org/events/GW150914/}{LIGO Open Science Center} as a Jupyter notebook. But why the were he  paper and the Jupyter notebook have been published separately? \textbf{It's clear that the PDF, which is unable to contain and execute data and code, can not be the format of choice for the paper of the future.} On the other hand, an Authorea paper is web-native, can easily include data and code and allows the reader to interact with the full research as they go through it.