deletions | additions       diff --git a/textbf_Methodology_At_Melbourne_and__.tex b/textbf_Methodology_At_Melbourne_and__.tex  index 4814a42..35bdf12 100644  --- a/textbf_Methodology_At_Melbourne_and__.tex  +++ b/textbf_Methodology_At_Melbourne_and__.tex 
...
\item For Giles \textbf{37} between 23-00UTC, \textbf{117} between 11-12UTC (though no soundings at this time).  \end{itemize}  \textbf{Thoughts and Actions}  \textit{Question - Can I use existing Era Int 850hPa Fronts dataset?}  \begin{itemize}  \item Colman 1990a implied ETS existed above very shallow surface inversions well below 850hPa, and in 1990b below ~970hPa. Browning et al 2010 observed the depth of surface inversion to 900hPa where convective initiation occurred above.   \item looks like I will need to calculate fronts dataset as low as I can go 1000? 950?. This will exclude frontal analysis in high topography regions  \item can i just use presence of surface inversion, and Tsurface (td surface) consistent with surrounding?  \end{itemize}  \textit{Question - How do I identify if a sounding lies on the cold/warm side of a front?}  \begin{itemize}