this is for holding javascript data
Eugeniu Plamadeala edited untitled.tex
about 9 years ago
Commit id: 752fef9922d95fbe5fc8126872ba237dd2ce3456
deletions | additions
diff --git a/untitled.tex b/untitled.tex
index cee620b..005e765 100644
--- a/untitled.tex
+++ b/untitled.tex
...
I want $K = K_R \oplus - K_L$. And $K_R = K_L = 1$.
What does this imply about the signs of the velocities in the fermionic Langrangian?
I think the correct thing is $\psi^\dagger_R i( \partial_t - v_F \, \partial_x) \psi_R$. This is what the perfect metal paper has.
Mike, this goes against your equation 1.8.
Next. (opposite velocities to PM paper)
$$ \mathcal{L}_f = \psi^\dagger_R i(\partial_t + v_F \partial_x) \psi_R + \psi^\dagger_L i(\partial_t - v_F \partial_x) \psi_L $$
I agree with your equation 1.7
I want $\psi^\dagger = e^{-i k_F x} \psi^\dagger_R + e^{i k_F x} \psi^\dagger_L$
and Just like in
addition $\psi^\dagger_R the perfect metal paper:
\begin{align}
\psi^\dagger_R & \propto
e^{i \phi_I}, & e^{-i \phi_I} \\
\psi^\dagger_L
& \propto
e^{- i \phi_{N+I}}$ & e^{i \phi_{N+I}}
\end{align}
This implies the variations are
$$ \delta \psi_{R,I} = \epsilon(i k_{F,I} +\partial_x \psi_{R,I} )$$