deletions | additions       diff --git a/observations.tex b/observations.tex  index 8d5f9ef..761a7c9 100644  --- a/observations.tex  +++ b/observations.tex 
...
In addition to the data in \citet{McConnachie2012}, we also include the more recent measurements or upper limits of cold atomic gas mass from \citet{Spekkens2014}.  We do not include the recently discovered ultra-faint satellites of the MW from the Dark Energy Survey \citep{Koposov2015, DES2015}, though if they are all quiescent galaxies, their inclusion would not change our results.  Observed dwarf galaxies show a tight correlation between their morphology, star formation, and cold gas content: all spheroidals have little-to-no detectable cold gas \citep[e.g.,][]{Grcevich_2009}  or ongoing star formation, and almost allof  irregulars have significant cold gas mass and ongoing star formation. Thus, we define ``quiescent'' satellites as those with $\mgas/\mstar<0.1$ or with colors and morphologies  that are classified as spheroidal resemble spheroidals  if they have no cold gas constraints. By this definition, the only star-forming, gas-rich satellites are: LMC ($\mstar=1.5\times10^9\msun$, $\mgas/\mstar\approx0.3$) and SMC ($\mstar=4.6\times10^8\msun$, $\mgas/\mstar\sim1$) around the MW, LGS 3 ($\mstar=9.6\times10^5\msun$, $\mgas/\mstar\approx0.4$) and IC 10 ($\mstar=9\times10^7$, $\mgas/\mstar\approx0.6$) around M31.  %(While Sculptor has $\mgas / \mstar \approx 0.096$, we consider it quiescent based on its morphology and lack of recent star formation \citep{Weisz2014a}).  %(Dan or Erik - can you say something about comparing these cuts with either SFR metrics or SFHs? Specifically, I am glossing over any ambiguous systems? - AW