this is for holding javascript data
Andrew Wetzel edited figures/qu.time_v_m.star_sat.first.t/caption.tex
about 9 years ago
Commit id: 6370996a226e8eac4f6e8fae7ed882b4b091c849
deletions | additions
diff --git a/figures/qu.time_v_m.star_sat.first.t/caption.tex b/figures/qu.time_v_m.star_sat.first.t/caption.tex
index 13e8c04..97958de 100644
--- a/figures/qu.time_v_m.star_sat.first.t/caption.tex
+++ b/figures/qu.time_v_m.star_sat.first.t/caption.tex
...
Error bars come from the 68\% uncertainty in observed quiescent fractions in Figure~\ref{fig:quiescent_fraction}.
Left panel uses time since first infall into the current MW/M31-like halo, while right panel uses time since first infall into \emph{any} host halo, thereby including possible effects of group preprocessing.
Gray triangle shows lower limit for the LMC/SMC system from its measured orbit \citep{Kallivayalil2013}, and gray pentagon shows the quenching timescale for Leo I from its measured orbit and star-formation history \citep{Sohn2013}.
Red squares show times inferred for satellites with $\mstar=10^{8.5}$, $10^{9.5}\msun$
around hosts with $\mstar>2.5\times10^{10}\msun$ in SDSS \citep{Wheeler2014}, and green curve shows the same for more massive satellites in groups of $\mvir=10^{12-13}\msun$ in SDSS \citep{Wetzel2013}.
The
satellite galaxies satellites in the MW/M31 halos quenched
much more rapidly after infall than more massive satellites (around other
hosts), with hosts).
Overall, the
quenching timescale
being increases with $\mstar$, is longest
near at $\mstar\sim10^9\msun$ (near Magellanic-Cloud
masses. masses), then decreases with further increasing $\mstar$.