this is for holding javascript data
Patrick Janot edited HigherEnergyUpgrades.tex
over 10 years ago
Commit id: f378b1d1cfa1e8c2d71cd109da691a664866e0fa
deletions | additions
diff --git a/HigherEnergyUpgrades.tex b/HigherEnergyUpgrades.tex
index 5c45fd7..7b7c189 100644
--- a/HigherEnergyUpgrades.tex
+++ b/HigherEnergyUpgrades.tex
...
\subsection{Higgs physics at higher energy}
and it It is not yet excluded to extend
it the centre-of-mass energy of the ILC by another factor of two towards $\sqrt{s} =$ 1 TeV, with a significant cost increase of about five billion dollars over the baseline project. Another linear collider project, CLIC~\cite{cite:CLICDR}, could also take over for the high-energy physics programme all the way to $\sqrt{s}=$ 3
TeV, which TeV. It would require, however, a
prohibitively high prohibitively-high electrical power
($\sim 600$~MW). of $\sim 600$~MW.
The foreseen energy upgrade of TLEP is of another, unique, and more ambitious, nature. It would consist in re-using the 80-to-100 km tunnel for a very-large-energy large hadron collider (VHE-LHC). If instrumented with magnets of 15 T, pp collisions would be produced at a centre-of-mass energy of 80 to 100 TeV. For completeness, pp collisions with a centre-of mass energy of 33 TeV, which would be obtained by re-using the LHC tunnel for a high-energy hadron collider (HE-LHC), are also addressed here.
To reach a similar accuracy in $\epem$ collisions, the upgrade of either ILC up to $\sqrt{s}=1$~TeV or CLIC up to $\sqrt{s}=3$~TeV. These long-term, multi-billion-dollars, upgrades can probably not be justified by the mere possibility of approaching the HL-LHC precision for this coupling. They are discussed in the next subsection.