this is for holding javascript data
Patrick Janot edited Z partial widths and peak cross section.tex
over 10 years ago
Commit id: b84589a4ae846d1f44da955f62c00f85970fce10
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Z partial widths and peak cross section.tex b/Z partial widths and peak cross section.tex
index 3429d43..fed98ea 100644
--- a/Z partial widths and peak cross section.tex
+++ b/Z partial widths and peak cross section.tex
...
\subsubsection{The Z hadronic and leptonic partial widths}
Determination of the Z partial widths requires measurements of branching ratios at the Z
peak, peak -- in particular the ratio of branching fractions of the Z boson into lepton
to and into hadrons
-- and the peak hadronic
cross-section. cross section. The
hadronic to leptonic hadronic-to-leptonic ratio was measured at LEP to be
$R_\ell \begin{equation}
R_\ell =
\frac{\Gamma_{had}}{\Gamma_{\ell}}= \frac{\Gamma_{\rm had}}{\Gamma_{\ell}}= 20.767\pm
0.025$ 0.025,
\end{equation}
with a
common systematic
error uncertainty of 0.007. The experimental
error uncertainty was dominated by the statistics of leptonic
decays; decays, and other uncertainties related to the event selection
systematics will tend to decrease with statistics. The remaining
systematics are systematic uncertainty were related to the
t-channel $t$-channel contribution in the electron channel
(this could be removed (which would vanish by
using the sole use of the muon
channel only) channel) and to the detailed modelling of
final state final-state radiation or emission of additional lepton
pairs: here pairs. Here, theory should be considerably helped by the large sample of leptonic Z decays available for the study of these rare processes. \\
{\em
We consider that a A relative precision of
$< 10^{-5}$ less than $10^{-5}$ is
considered to be a reasonable target
goal for the ratio of the
hadronic to leptonic Z hadronic-to-leptonic partial widths at
TLEP-Z }. TLEP}.
\subsubsection{The peak hadronic cross section and the number of neutrinos}
This measurement of the peak hadronic cross-section is already dominated by theoretical systematics
today, related to the understanding of the
low angle Bhabha cross-section. low-angle Bhabha-scattering cross section (needed for the integrated luminosity measurement). It is a measurement of great interest as it determines the Z invisible width, a direct test of the unitarity of the PMNS matrix -- or of the existence of sterile neutrinos. The present measurement expressed in terms of a number of active neutrinos
$N_\nu \begin{equation}
N_\nu = 2.984 \pm
0.008$ 0.008,
\end{equation}
is ~2$\sigma$ below the SM value of 3. The experimental conditions at TLEP will be adequate to improve the experimental uncertainty considerably but a commensurate effort would have to be invested in the theoretical calculations of the small angle Bhabha scattering used for luminosity normalization to make this measurement worthwhile. {\em A desirable goal would be to reduce the uncertainty on $N_\nu$ down to $\pm 0.001$ but it is not clear that it can be achieved from Z peak measurements}.