this is for holding javascript data
Patrick Janot edited 13311371909925748.tex
almost 11 years ago
Commit id: 64a0f12b6695c20c11de20fdb788a73ab9603eb7
deletions | additions
diff --git a/13311371909925748.tex b/13311371909925748.tex
index 58b3b95..3341c96 100644
--- a/13311371909925748.tex
+++ b/13311371909925748.tex
...
The partial decay width $\Gamma{\rm(H \to WW)}$ is directly proportional to the inclusive cross section $\sigma_{\rm WW \to H}$. The Higgs boson branching ratios to WW and to ${\rm b\bar b}$ are in turn obtained from the measurements performed at $\sqrt{s} = 240$ GeV, the precision of which can be inferred from Table~\ref{tab:HiggsBranching}. With the 350 (240) GeV data, TLEP is therefore able to determine the Higgs boson decay width with a precision of the order of 1.1\% (2.3\%) with WW fusion. When combined with the ZZZ final state, the precision on the total Higgs boson width from TLEP is estimated to be 0.9\%. These numbers are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:Width}, together with a comparison with ILC predictions.
\label{tab:Width}
\begin{table}
\caption{Table~\ref{tab:Width}: Statistical precision of the total Higgs boson width
measurement measurements from TLEP and ILC.}
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|}
Process and final state & TLEP & ILC \\
${\small \epemto {\rm HZ}}$ with ${\rm \small H \to ZZ}$ & {\bf 3.1\%} & 20\% \\