deletions | additions       diff --git a/The_above_results_are_obtained__.tex b/The_above_results_are_obtained__.tex  index abf6078..74f25ec 100644  --- a/The_above_results_are_obtained__.tex  +++ b/The_above_results_are_obtained__.tex 
...
In the first configuration, it turns out that relaxing the constraint on $F^\gamma_{1A}$ does not sizeably change the precision on the other three $F^X_{1V,A}$ form factors, as shown in Table~\ref{tab:f1}. A per-cent accuracy is also obtained on $F^\gamma_{1A}$.  \begin{table}  \begin{center}  \caption{\label{tab:f1} Precision on the four $F_{1V,A}^X$ expected with $2.4\,{\rm ab}^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 365$\,GeV at the FCC-ee, if $F_{1A}^\gamma$ is fixed to its standard model value (first row) or if this constraint is relaxed (second raw). The precision precisions  expected with $500\,{\rm fb}^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 500$\,GeV is are  indicated in the third row.} \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|}  \hline Precision on & $F_{1V}^\gamma$ & $F_{1V}^Z$ & $F_{1A}^\gamma$ & $F_{1A}^Z$ \\  \hline\hline Only three $F_{1V,A}^X$ & $1.2\, 10^{-3}$ & $2.9\, 10^{-3}$ & $0.0\, 10^{-2}$ & $2.4\, 10^{-2}$ \\  \hline All four $F_{1V,A}^X$ & $1.2\, 10^{-3}$ & $3.0\, 10^{-3}$ & $1.3\, 10^{-2}$ & $2.6\, 10^{-3}$ 10^{-2}$  \\ \hline $\sqrt{s} = 500$\,GeV & $5.5\, 10^{-3}$ & $1.5\, 10^{-2}$ & $1.0\, 10^{-2}$ & $2.2\, 10^{-2}$ \\   \hline  \end{tabular}