this is for holding javascript data
Patrick Janot edited EnergySensitivity.tex
about 9 years ago
Commit id: cab32cdf6c371bc803c0d0bb9630a8789b8f0434
deletions | additions
diff --git a/EnergySensitivity.tex b/EnergySensitivity.tex
index 9edd8fb..b46f4c9 100644
--- a/EnergySensitivity.tex
+++ b/EnergySensitivity.tex
...
The maximum centre-of-mass energy of the FCC-ee is yet unknown. It was inferred in Ref.~\cite{Bicer_2014} that, if the
total RF
gradient voltage were
multiplied increased by
three a factor 3 with respect to the baseline, a centre-of-mass energy of 500\,GeV could be reached, and an integrated luminosity of $500\, {\rm fb}^{-1}$ could be delivered over a period of three years, as displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:lumi} with the red dashed line. In the framework of the FCC,
however, the interest of such an upgrade could not be demonstrated for the physics of the Higgs
boson, but it boson~\cite{Bicer_2014}. It is interesting to re-evaluate this statement in view of the physics of the
top-quark. top quark.
The centre-of-mass energy was therefore varied from 350 to 500\,GeV, and the corresponding integrated luminosity was varied linearly
with $\sqrt{s}$ from 2.6 to 0.5\,${\rm ab}^{-1}$. The expected uncertainties on the top electroweak form factors,
$\delta F_{1V}^\gamma$, $\delta F_{1V}^Z$, $\delta F_{1A}^Z$, $\delta F_{2V}^\gamma$ $\sigma(F_{1V}^\gamma)$, $\sigma(F_{1V}^Z)$, $\sigma(F_{1A}^Z)$, $\sigma(F_{2V}^\gamma)$ and
$\delta F_{2V}^Z$, $\sigma(F_{2V}^Z)$, were determined as explained in Section~\ref{sec:optimal},
correcting with corrections for the
lepton energy and angular resolutions, the event selection
efficiency efficiency, and the detector
acceptance acceptance, as described at the beginning of Section~\ref{sec:sensitivities}, for each
value of the centre-of-mass energy. The variation of these uncertainties with $\sqrt{s}$ is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:variation}.