this is for holding javascript data
Patrick Janot edited EnergySensitivity.tex
about 9 years ago
Commit id: 7d5bbffab76a701822d311a80e69c15995c56831
deletions | additions
diff --git a/EnergySensitivity.tex b/EnergySensitivity.tex
index b46f4c9..91ccbd0 100644
--- a/EnergySensitivity.tex
+++ b/EnergySensitivity.tex
...
The maximum centre-of-mass energy of the FCC-ee is yet unknown. It was inferred in Ref.~\cite{Bicer_2014} that, if the total RF voltage were increased by a factor 3 with respect to the baseline, a centre-of-mass energy of 500\,GeV could be reached, and an integrated luminosity of $500\, {\rm fb}^{-1}$ could be delivered over a period of three years, as displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:lumi} with the red dashed line. In the framework of the FCC, however, the interest of such an upgrade could not be demonstrated for the physics of the Higgs boson~\cite{Bicer_2014}. It is interesting to re-evaluate this statement in view of the physics of the top quark.
The centre-of-mass energy was therefore varied from 350 to 500\,GeV, and the corresponding integrated luminosity was varied linearly with $\sqrt{s}$ from 2.6 to 0.5\,${\rm ab}^{-1}$. The expected uncertainties on the top electroweak form factors, $\sigma(F_{1V}^\gamma)$, $\sigma(F_{1V}^Z)$, $\sigma(F_{1A}^Z)$, $\sigma(F_{2V}^\gamma)$ and $\sigma(F_{2V}^Z)$, were determined as explained in
Section~\ref{sec:optimal}, the previous section, with corrections for the lepton energy and angular resolutions, the event selection efficiency, and the detector acceptance, as described
at the beginning of Section~\ref{sec:sensitivities}, above, for each value of the centre-of-mass energy. The variation of these uncertainties with $\sqrt{s}$ is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:variation}.