Patrick Janot edited Theory.tex  about 9 years ago

Commit id: 201b0f0f6064e85024e0da52f18b08416e658b95

deletions | additions      

       

\end{equation}  which easily relates to the previous parameterization with  \begin{eqnarray}  A_v+\delta A_v = - 2\sin\theta_W \left( F_{1V}^X + F_{2V}^X \right), \ \ \right) & ; &  B_v+\delta B_v = - 2\sin\theta_W F_{1A}^X, \\ \delta C_v = 2\sin\theta_W F_{2V}^X { and } & ; &  \delta D_v = 2i\sin\theta_W F_{2A}^X. \end{eqnarray}  The expected sensitivities can be derived in any of these parameterizations. Although originally derived with the parameterization of Ref.~\cite{Grzadkowski_2000}, the estimates presented in Section~\ref{sec:sensitivities} and~\ref{sec:summary}, however, use the parameterization of Ref.~\cite{Baer_2013}, for an easy comparison. For the same reason, although it is not needed, the same restrictions as in Ref.~\cite{Baer_2013} are applied here: only the six CP conserving form factors are considered (i.e., the two $F_{2A}^X$ are both assumed to vanish), and either the four form factors $F_{1V,A}^X$ are varied simultaneously while the the two $F_{2V}^X$ are fixed to their standard model values, or vice-versa. A careful reading of Ref.~\cite{Baer_2013} (and references therein) shows that also the form factor $F_{1A}^\gamma$ was kept to its standard model value for the extraction of the final sensitivities.