this is for holding javascript data
Cato edited Payam.tex
almost 11 years ago
Commit id: 39855589e242291a0a85117dbaab14833d6379bd
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Payam.tex b/Payam.tex
index d186252..cb02237 100644
--- a/Payam.tex
+++ b/Payam.tex
...
\item In \citet{2013PhRvE..87d2723R} page 5, it is claimed that motion will be a superposition of longitudinal and transverse. Is this true -- won't one of them be unstable (in the case where work done in dragging is less than $T$, say)?
\item In \citet{2013PhRvE..87d2723R} page 5, second column, Payam uses dimensional analysis to justify a steady state approximation used in the paper: the time taken to establish the fluid velocity profile around a section of DNA must be much shorter than the time taken the DNA to move its own
length.\newline Try length.\\
I want to try to do a better job than
Payam's scaling argument: what are the
coefficients? The fact that coefficients in the
other paper they are off by some distance $\# \ll 1$ relationship? This might be
to interesting because of a problem acknowledged in Payam's other paper: that his predictions do
with this. not fit the experimental data.
\begin{itemize}
\item I think $t_{\rm h}\sim \ell/c_{\rm s}$ on physical grounds, but Payam says $t_{\rm h}\sim \ell^2\rho/\eta$ from dimensional analysis. Are these compatible?
%