deletions | additions       diff --git a/Bfield.tex b/Bfield.tex  index 39293f8..5a0bdf9 100644  --- a/Bfield.tex  +++ b/Bfield.tex 
...
Second, the stellar wind could be threaded by a stellar magnetic field. Fields on YSOs are often quite complex with a mixture of open and closed field lines \citep[e.g.][]{2011MNRAS.417..472D,2012MNRAS.425.2948D} and their configuration changes in coronal activity. Since field strength and geometry on YSOs are variable and not well constrained, we cannot include this effect in our model.  Qualitatively, closed field lines can either fill with coronal plasma or connect to the accretion disk and carry accretion funnels. Only those parts of the stellar surface connected to open field lines can launch a wind. Thus, the total mass loss rate would be reduced compared to a spherical wind that we assume here. On the other hand, the field would provide some additional pressure, compensating for pushing  the loss of thermal pressure due shock front  to a reduced density. larger radii.  %Otherwise, the disk wind would also have to be very dense (probably too dense to be consistent with observations) to provide this pressure. Observationally, it is difficult to distinguish the stellar wind from the disk wind. The slower jet components observed further away from the jet axis carry much of the mass flow \citep{2000ApJ...537L..49B}. Their origin is probably the inner region of the disk and not the star \citep{2003ApJ...590L.107A}. Thus, it is fully consistent that our model predicts a mass loss fraction larger than $10^{-3}$ of the stellar wind at X-ray emitting temperatures. If the disk wind dominates over the stellar wind in mass loss, then the fraction of hot gas in the (stellar plus inner disk) jet might still be small.