this is for holding javascript data
Nelson Fernández edited Results.tex
over 10 years ago
Commit id: a7d2a4b5033e11741140f1951c9d6ce373b8e50f
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Results.tex b/Results.tex
index 2250c4b..6d128c8 100644
--- a/Results.tex
+++ b/Results.tex
...
\subsection{Homeostasis}
The homeostasis \textit{h} calculation by comparing the daily values of all variables is a useful indicator for periodic or seasonal dynamics characterization and determination. \textit{h} can represents the temporal variation of the state of each subsystem in each lake. This situation is more evident in the Physico-chemical subsystem of lakes which responds proportionally with the seasonal changes affecting variables like temperature, light and others
relate related with the hydrological cycle. Limiting Nutrient subsystems works in a larger scale than Physico-chemical subsystem; it seems that nutrients could vary more at week scales than day scales. For all three subsystems, biomass demonstrated has the largest scale variation; in special at the T which their biomass variation takes place in several months intervals. The above homeostasis results demonstrates the importance of the temporal timescale because \textit{h} can vary considerably if we compare states every minute or every month.
For \textit{H}, the table **
relates the shows mean values and standard deviation for all lakes and subsystems. Considering
that the lakes studied maintains periods without changes, values of H are all in the category of very-high homeostasis. We observe that Biomass and Physico-chemical were more stable
systems in a year than Limiting Nutrients subsystem. In
detail by the lake at detail, the Ar and NL Biomass
is were more
regular regulars than NL and T. Physico-chemical subsystem have a similar regularity for all lakes being the lower NL. For Limiting Nutrients, the lower regularity is also
for NL and the high for Ar.