\documentclass[10pt]{article}

\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\usepackage[section]{placeins}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{breakcites}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{hyphenat}





\PassOptionsToPackage{hyphens}{url}
\usepackage[colorlinks = true,
            linkcolor = blue,
            urlcolor  = blue,
            citecolor = blue,
            anchorcolor = blue]{hyperref}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\makeatletter
\patchcmd\@combinedblfloats{\box\@outputbox}{\unvbox\@outputbox}{}{%
  \errmessage{\noexpand\@combinedblfloats could not be patched}%
}%
\makeatother


\usepackage[round]{natbib}
\let\cite\citep




\renewenvironment{abstract}
  {{\bfseries\noindent{\abstractname}\par\nobreak}\footnotesize}
  {\bigskip}

\titlespacing{\section}{0pt}{*3}{*1}
\titlespacing{\subsection}{0pt}{*2}{*0.5}
\titlespacing{\subsubsection}{0pt}{*1.5}{0pt}


\usepackage{authblk}


\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[space]{grffile}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{booktabs,array,multirow}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amssymb}
\providecommand\citet{\cite}
\providecommand\citep{\cite}
\providecommand\citealt{\cite}
% You can conditionalize code for latexml or normal latex using this.
\newif\iflatexml\latexmlfalse
\providecommand{\tightlist}{\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}}%

\AtBeginDocument{\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.PDF,.eps,.EPS,.png,.PNG,.tif,.TIF,.jpg,.JPG,.jpeg,.JPEG}}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[ngerman,english]{babel}










\begin{document}

\title{Creating an international platform for open science blogger}



\author[1]{Julien Colomb}%
\author[2]{Jon Tennant}%
\affil[1]{Freie Universität Berlin}%
\affil[2]{Imperial College London}%


\vspace{-1em}



  
  \date{May 07, 2024}


\begingroup
\let\center\flushleft
\let\endcenter\endflushleft
\maketitle
\endgroup








\sloppy


Foreword: this document was meant for internal use only, but feel free
to take any ideas and bing it to completion if you like. The content of
this~article is licensed CC0.

\par\null

Play a leading role in building an international blog platform about
Open Science for the Leibniz Research Alliance Science 2.0. outline
within 5-10 minutes your ideas to build such a platform.

\par\null

\section*{Introduction}\label{introduction}

Such a blog platform should be a hub not only for scientist to get
information about new trends and new tools in open science, but also for
non-scientists to get a glimpse at the work in the academia and get
information about science in general. It should therefore be accepting
inputs mainly from scientists (\textasciitilde{}50\%), but also from
startupers, citizen scientists and other stakeholders. The role of the
editor should be to ensure that entries are of quality, in terms of
scientific content and in term of PR rules. It should also be fun to
read.

Germany has probably the most advanced and efficient PR strategies, but
perform mostly german speaking/writing actions. It would be great to
bring this PR expertise together with the communication styles of the
21th century. Dr Colomb and Dr. Tennant have been working together for
the last two years on building a community of open science friends in
Berlin (and in the world) and would be well fitted to continue their
work and lead the way in open science blogging for the Leibniz Research
Alliance.

\section*{How would you proceed?}\label{how-would-you-proceed}

\begin{enumerate}
\def\labelenumi{\arabic{enumi}.}
\tightlist
\item
  Prepare the workflow, quality control strategies and marketing routes.
\item
  Define with the team the frequencies and different types of posts.
\item
  Start to build the community of bloggers, by contacting putative
  participants.
\item
  Prepare the blog design
\item
  Blog and get feedback from early users.
\item
  Get readers (twitter, facebook, but also contact laborjournal, other
  specialised journal for the scientific community, normal journals and
  TV shows)
\item
  Work on other media (audio/video)
\end{enumerate}



\section*{What are important partners and
stakeholders?}\label{what-are-important-partners-and-stakeholders}

\begin{enumerate}
\def\labelenumi{\arabic{enumi}.}
\setcounter{enumi}{1}
\tightlist
\item
  Bloggers: Scientists, librarians, startupers, funders, publishers,
  politics, citizens scientists, citizens showing interest.
\item
  PR professionals (Wissenschaft in Dialog). Their experience in terms
  of quality control and marketing strategies might be important.
\item
  Journalists: they can reach the community faster and boost the
  readership, on the other hand we would create high quality content
  they can use.
\item
  Other open science advocacy programs: GFZ,HU,FU,BIH (for Berlin, then
  expand), openaire, opencon, \ldots{}
\end{enumerate}

~

\section*{Which processes have to be
established?}\label{which-processes-have-to-be-established}

\begin{itemize}
\tightlist
\item
  quality control (see ``PR Leitlinien'' -only in German-,
  https://www.wissenschaft-im-dialog.de/fileadmin/user\_upload/user\_upload/LEITLINIEN\_WISSPR\_17\_11\_Druck\_komprimiert.pdf)
\item
  request for blogger entries / response to bloggers asking to write for
  us
\item
  Schedule of blogs
\item
  Blog types, tags
\item
  WORK iteratively: get feedback, modify the concept according to it.
\end{itemize}



\section*{crazier ideas}\label{crazier-ideas}

\begin{itemize}
\tightlist
\item
  Peer reviewed blog posts.

  \begin{itemize}
  \tightlist
  \item
    in 12h
  \item
    may be able to test different kind of incentives for reviewers/ new
    peer review processes
  \end{itemize}
\item
  Debating posts: 2 bloggers with different position talk about their
  disaccord.
\item
  Reviews posts: reviews of blogs about one subject (same kind of
  process as for papers)
\item
  ``People'' journalism posts: the life of scientists in the open, what
  is behind the scene\ldots{}
\end{itemize}

\selectlanguage{english}
\FloatBarrier
\end{document}

