The cloud based collaborative authoring. 


                                  

dfasd

[Type the document title]

[Type the document subtitle]

 

[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]


Priscylla Bezerra Camelo

19/02/2016


Km2 H\(km^2\)O


The cloud-based collaborative authoring

Land and Water office – Black Mountain

 

 

 

Table of Contents

Executive Summary. 2

1.    Introduction. 3

2.    Methodology. 4

2.1       Interviews. 4

2.2       Requirements. 4

3.    Results. 6

3.1       List of requirements (maybe use another specific word for this part) 6

3.2       Results from tests. 6

3.3       Costs. 6

4.    Recommendations. 7

5.    Appendices. 8

 


 

Executive Summary

 

 

List of ideas:

            List of common problems that are currently happening

            Cost analysis


 

 

1.  Introduction

 

The Microsoft Word is a tool that has been used for a long time. This tool is universally available and the most of writers, students and workers nowadays use it to produce their documents. However, sometimes this tool cannot efficiently support those people because they are getting more and more demanding. Nevertheless the writing tools plays an important role in the production of information. Thus, it is necessary work on improving the way that people are using writing tools in CSIRO.

Recently it is becoming more common to have people from different parts of the world working on the same thing and usually in the same document. The magnitude of science projects are quickly getting bigger. The number of people working in the same project is increasing and it is getting more usual to see people from different cities working together.  One simple example of this is the Bioregional Assessment project where there are people from Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne, Canberra, Brisbane (*** where else?) working integrated in the same project and developing analysis and reports together.

The writing software plays important roles in this work. It is where the communication between those people working from different places happens. Also, it is usually where findings of research are showed, checked, reviewed, commented, discussed, analysed, and reformed. Moreover, it is a space that will be transformed in results and products that goes to the public access.

However, there are many problems currently happening in the development of products from the Land and Water team from CSIRO. Many editors, product assistants, project coordinators, project leaders might end up spending too much time doing things that are not really important what sometimes cause frustration for them. Some of those problems are directly related to the writing tools currently available for them. There is a list of example of those problems later in this report and those problems can be summarized in the idea that Microsoft Word might not be handing the actual demands from people working in big projects in CSIRO.

Therefore, it is fundamental to have a tool that allows an efficient integrated work and also that allows the CSIRO employers to work in their highest potential. And this is the purpose of this project. It is to analyse the actual writing tool and the actual need from scientists, reviewers, editors, coordinators, assistants, leaders when producing their work to be able to end up with a better solution.

 

 


 

2.  Methodology

 

In a total of 12 weeks some steps were undertaken. The methodology adopted in each of them are described below.

 

2.1       Interviews

 

·         Questions

Brainstorm

What is the main purpose of this work? Then obtained the questions working together

Analysis of what people would understand from questions and what they would answer

Work on the questions based on those efficiencies in interviews  

Confluence

·          Interview process

 

Expected time

Real time

Place

People interviewed – Quantity, roles and names

·         Transcriptions

Time used

Problems and solutions

Software used to share notes and transcriptions

 

 

2.2       Requirements

 

Small explanation about what is coming

 

·         Collecting data

Usage of transcriptions – highlights (red & pink)

Tables – important parts

·         Categorizing

 

List of categories – similar subjects – easier to identify similar requirements and complement requirements

·         Creating requirements


 

3.  Results

3.1       List of requirements (maybe use another specific word for this part)

3.2       Results from tests

3.3       Costs


 

4.  Recommendations

Recommendations based in what I’ve seen until that step in the process


 

5.  Appendices


 

 


Heading 1
Heading 2

Text - content 


Heading 3