Introduction

Although it is not yet possible to get exact answers, any new opening in a given problem area can help in the consideration of the phenomenon as a whole and of its parts and thus contribute to the processes. The question is how to begin to analyze the subject under consideration. It might be prudent to begin with the following question: what is the politicization of the intelligence system? But one could also begin with the question: what consequences it produces on the decision-making system?
The targets of hostile actions are knowledge, national identity, social and political structure, critical infrastructure and defense and security sector, etc. and it is expected that the range of targets will expand in the future and that the number of possible targets is open and infinite, that is, it is incomprehensibly broad but still inseparable from the concerned society. One could easily conclude that performers of these actions could not survive without their audience/actors in interactive scenarios they inititated.
This analysis will be limited to only a few targets whose mutual relations will be simulated in the context of content and scope. Their relation to the politicization of the intelligence system will also be examined as well as politicization itself through the available literature review.
Emphasis is given to the potential scenarios resulting from the hostile action, as well as to the possible moments when they could be prevented with the minimal damage to the protected society. For the purpose of this paper, in order to research potential models, decision-making system has been analysed and distinction is made between regular and irregular politicization and the consequences they project on the decision-making system.