KEY CLINICAL MESSAGE:
Pancreatic myeloid sarcoma is a rare manifestation of myeloid neoplasms.
Its diagnosis can be challenging due to its rarity and potential to
mimic other pancreatic malignancies. We report a case of pancreatic
myeloid sarcoma revealing acute myeloid leukemia.
KEYWORDS:
Myeloid sarcoma, Acute myeloid leukemia, Pancreas, Chemotherapy.
INTRODUCTION:
Myeloid sarcoma (MS), also known as granulocytic sarcoma or chloroma, is
a rare extramedullary tumor composed of immature myeloid cells1. According to the World Health Organization (WHO)
classification, MS is defined as a tumor mass consisting of myeloid
blasts, with or without maturation, occurring at an anatomic site other
than bone marrow 2. MS can occur as isolated condition
or be associated to other myeloid disorders like AML, myeloproliferative
neoplasms, or myelodysplastic syndromes, either at the initial diagnosis
and during relapse. 3. The clinical manifestations of
MS vary widely depending on the size and the location of the tumor.
While MS can occur in various parts of the body, its infiltration of the
pancreas is particularly rare and has been reported in only few cases in
literature. This rarity can make the diagnosis challenging, especially
since it can mimic other pancreatic cancer, which are more common4,5. This report presents a case of pancreatic MS
revealing AML.
CASE PRESENTATION:
Case History / examination:
A 34-year-old man, with no past history, presented to the emergency
department with jaundice, epigastric pain, vomiting and nausea. His
physical examination revealed generalized icterus, 2 cm right inguinal
adenopathy, hepatomegaly (hepatic span of 18 cm), and splenomegaly
(splenic span of 16 cm).
Methods (Investigations and treatment):
Blood chemistry analyses revealed abnormal liver function tests which
include elevated levels of liver enzymes: alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
at 137 IU/L (N <34 IU/L) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
at 120 IU/L (N < 31 IU/L), elevated bilirubin levels: total
bilirubin at 268 mmol/L (N <25 mmol/L) and conjugated
bilirubin at 161 mmol/L (N <5.1 mmol/L), and abnormal levels
of alkaline phosphatases at 242 IU/L (N <91 IU/L) and of
Ɣ-glutamyl transferase (Ɣ-GT) at 133 IU/L (N <38 IU/L).
Pancreatic function was also impaired with elevated lipase level of 127
IU/L (N <45 IU/L).
Blood count showed WBC count of 26.6 10³/µL with 38% myeloid blast,
hemoglobin of 11.6g/dL, and platelet count of 29000/µL. Therefore, the
patient was admitted to hematology department for further exploration.
Bone marrow examination confirmed AML type FAB M4. Flow cytometry
revealed leukemic cells positive for CD117, CD33, CD13, CD64, CD7 and cy
MPO confirming AML-M4.
To further investigate the patient’s digestive symptoms, along with the
disturbances in liver and pancreatic function, an abdomino-pelvic
computed tomography (CT) scan was ordered revealing a swollen appearance
of the head and uncus of the pancreas measuring 37 * 38 mm, with
enhancement similar to the rest of the pancreas associated with
hepatomegaly (hepatic span of 20 cm), dilation of the bile ducts,
splenomegaly (splenic span of 17 cm), and multiple intra-abdominal
lymphadenopathies (Figure 1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
showed a mass suspected in the uncinate process of the head of pancreas,
causing intra- and- extra hepatic duct dilation (Figure 2).
The CA19.9 level was high at 85 U/ml (N < 27 U/ml) and the ACE
was normal at 3 ng/ml (N < 40 ng/ml). Unfortunately,
endoscopic biopsy of the pancreatic mass did not proceed due to severe
thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of bleeding.
The diagnosis of AML-M4 was retained with a probable associated
pancreatic MS and induction chemotherapy with Cytarabine and Idarubicin
was started.
The bone marrow examination on day 28, following the induction
chemotherapy, showing cytological failure of AML and the abdominal CT
revealed the persistence of pancreatic masse.
The patient underwent a second chemotherapy course combining Cytarabine
and Mitoxantrone leading to a complete cytological remission. In
addition, abdominal CT scan and pancreatic MRI showed morphological
remission with a total regression of pancreatic mass (Figure
3) .
Conclusion and Results (Outcome and follow-up):
The diagnosis of pancreatic MS was retrospectively retained based on the
disappearance of the tumor after AML-chemotherapy.
The patient received then 3 consolidation chemotherapy courses and then
he underwent to allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. After
a 32-month follow-up, our patient is in complete persistent remission.
DISCUSSION:
Myeloid sarcoma is an extramedullary proliferation of immature myeloid
cells that disrupts the normal architecture of the tissue where it
originates 6. Primarily, MS precedes AML, or both
pathologies are discovered simultaneously. MS may also present de novo
or as a relapse of AML 3 but isolated MS is extremely
rare, with an overall incidence of less than 1% as compared with
2.5-9% in patients with AML 7. MS mainly occur in
skin, soft tissue, lymph nodes, testis and bones which makes clinical
symptoms vary widely depending on the location of the tumor8 .
However, pancreatic localization is extremely rare and, to our
knowledge, only twenty-one cases have been reported in the literature5,9,10 (Table 1). Pancreatic MS may be
isolated 4,9,11–15, precede or appear concurrently
with other hematological malignancies whether at initial presentation or
at relapse 5,16–23. The clinical symptoms of
pancreatic MS are non-specific but almost all patients presented with
epigastric or abdominal pain. Other symptoms can be associated such as
jaundice, weight loss, fatigue, nausea or vomiting (Table 1).In fact, symptoms vary depending on the specific location of the tumor
within the pancreas. While the tumor often localizes in the head of the
pancreas, as is the case with our patient, the tail of the pancreas can
also be affected in some cases (Table 1) .
Treatment strategies of pancreatic MS are limited because of the rarity
of the disease and lack of randomized clinical trials. In addition,
therapeutic choice is influenced by the different subsets including
isolated MS versus synchronous MS, newly diagnosed, or relapsed24. Controlled clinical trials including and/or
specific to MS patients are missing, making the superiority of one
regimen over the others unknown. However, the use of systemic therapy is
recommended. Moreover, the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network
guidelines recommend treating isolated extramedullary MS with induction
chemotherapy similar to that for patients with overt AML. This also
applies to MS cases with concurrent bone marrow involvement25. Thus, the majority of reported cases of pancreatic
MS have been treated by AML-Type chemotherapy (Table 1).Similarly, our patient obtained remission after 2 AML-Type chemotherapy
courses leading to proceed allogenic hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation. Conversely, the latest European LeukemiaNet (ELN)
guidelines offer no specific recommendations 26.
CONCLUSION:
The rarity of pancreatic MS and the non-specific of clinical
manifestation makes diagnosis challenging. The similarity in clinical
presentation underscores the importance of considering MS in the
differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses, especially in cases where
the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is not straightforward or where there
is a history of hematologic malignancy. The occurrence of isolated
pancreatic MS in a patient with no history of hematologic malignancy
adds an additional layer of complexity to the diagnosis which can lead
to potential delays in diagnosis and appropriate management. While rapid
confirmation of the diagnosis is crucial to promptly initiate systemic
therapy with AML-Type chemotherapy.
REFERENCES:
1. Shallis RM, Gale RP, Lazarus HM, et al. Myeloid sarcoma, chloroma, or
extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia tumor: A tale of misnomers,
controversy and the unresolved. Blood Rev . 2021;47:100773.
doi:10.1016/j.blre.2020.100773
2. Berti E, Busque L, Chan JKC, et al. The 5th edition of the World
Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours : Myeloid
and Histiocytic / Dendritic Neoplasms. 2022;(May).
doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1
3. Magdy M, Abdel Karim N, Eldessouki I, Gaber O, Rahouma M, Ghareeb M.
Myeloid Sarcoma. Oncol Res Treat . 2019;42(4):219-224.
doi:10.1159/000497210
4. Al-Obaidi A, Parker NA, Hussein Agha Y, Alqam H, Page S. Pancreatic
Myeloid Sarcoma. Cureus . 2020;12(6):1-7. doi:10.7759/cureus.8462
5. Wu K, Zhang X, Zhang B. Myeloid sarcoma of the pancreas: A case
report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) .
2021;100(13):e24913. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000024913
6. Shahin OA, Ravandi F. Myeloid sarcoma. Curr Opin Hematol .
2020;27(2):88-94. doi:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000571
7. Goyal G, Bartley AC, Patnaik MM, Litzow MR, Al-Kali A, Go RS.
Clinical features and outcomes of extramedullary myeloid sarcoma in the
United States: Analysis using a national data set. Blood Cancer
J . 2017;7(8). doi:10.1038/bcj.2017.79
8. Meyer HJ, Pönisch W, Schmidt SA, et al. Clinical and imaging features
of myeloid sarcoma: A German multicenter study. BMC Cancer .
2019;19(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6357-y
9. Li XP, Liu WF, Ji SR, Wu SH, Sun JJ, Fan YZ. Isolated pancreatic
granulocytic sarcoma: A case report and review of the literature.World J Gastroenterol . 2011;17(4):540-542.
doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i4.540
10. Norsworthy KJ, Bhatnagar B, Singh ZN, Gojo I. Myeloid sarcoma of the
hepatobiliary system: A case series and review of the literature.Acta Haematol . 2016;135(4):241-251. doi:10.1159/000444516
11. Moreaul P, Milpied N, Fiche M, et al. b & e Sarcome granulocytique
primitif du pancreas : efficacite d ’ un traitement prkcoce par
chimioth & apie intensive. Published online 1995:3-5.
12. Dimicoli S, Feugier P, Delaby P, et al. [Granulocyte sarcoma of
the pancreas without extra-pancreatic location]. Presse Med .
2002;31(22):1024-1026.
13. Rong Y, Wang D, Lou W, Kuang T, Jin D. Granulocytic sarcoma of the
pancreas: A case report and review of the literatures. BMC
Gastroenterol . 2010;10(Figure 2):10-12. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-10-80
14. Messager M, Amielh D, Chevallier C, Mariette C. Isolated
granulocytic sarcoma of the pancreas : A tricky diagnostic for primary
pancreatic extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia. World J Surg
Oncol . 2012;10(1):13. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-10-13
15. Tokunaga K, Yamamura A, Ueno S, Kikukawa Y. Isolated Pancreatic
Myeloid Sarcoma Associated with. Published online 2018:563-568.
doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.8912-17
16. Ewen SWB, Sewell HF, Dawson AA. Obstructive Jaundice. 1987;(July
1985):1985-1988.
17. Marcos HB, Semelka RC, Woosley JT. Abdominal granulocytic sarcomas:
demonstration by MRI. 1997;15(7):873-876.
18. Mwanda WO, Rajab JA. Granulocytic sarcoma: report of three cases.East Afr Med J . 1999;76(10):594-596.
19. Breccia M, Andrea DM, Mengarelli A, et al. Granulocytic sarcoma of
the pancreas successfully treated with intensive chemotherapy and stem
cell transplantation. Published online 2003:190-192.
20. Servin-Abad L, Caldera H, Cardenas R, Casillas J. Granulocytic
sarcoma of the pancreas: A report of one case and review of the
literature. Acta Haematol . 2003;110(4):188-192.
doi:10.1159/000074223
21. Sch HS, Becker H, Schmitt-gr A, Michael L. Granulocytic sarcoma of
Core-binding Factor ( CBF ) acute myeloid leukemia mimicking pancreatic
cancer. 2008;32:1472-1475. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2008.02.017
22. Tabriz N, Tannapfel A, Griesinger F, Weyhe D. Chloroma of Pancreas
— Initial Manifestation of a Secondary Leukemia after Stem Cell
Transplantation Case Report and Review of the Literature. Published
online 2013:1331-1335. doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2166-9
23. Ct F fdg PET. Granulocytic sarcoma of the pancreas on 18 F-FDG
PET/CT. Published online 2016:9-11.
24. Loscocco GG, Vannucchi AM. Myeloid sarcoma: more and less than a
distinct entity. Ann Hematol . 2023;102(8):1973-1984.
doi:10.1007/s00277-023-05288-1
25. Tallman MS, Wang ES, Altman JK, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia,
version 3.2019. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw .
2019;17(6):721-749. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0028
26. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, et al. Diagnosis and management of
AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel
on behalf of the ELN. Blood . 2022;140(12):1345-1377.
doi:10.1182/blood.2022016867
27. Estey E, Cortes J, Giles FJ. CASE REPORT Granulocytic sarcoma of the
pancreas : a report of. 1999;(1993):219-224.
28. Kawamura M, Kaku H, Ito T, Funata N, Taki T. FLT3 -internal tandem
duplication in a pediatric patient with t ( 8 ; 21 ) acute myeloid
leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet . 2010;203(2):292-296.
doi:10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.07.130
29. Cases C. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2018;6(11):477-483.
doi:10.12998/wjcc.v6.i11.477
Title of images and table (provided as a separate files):
Image 1: Abdominal CT scan after contrast: axial sections (a
and b) and coronal reconstructions: Tissue mass centered on the head and
uncus of the pancreas (white arrow), spontaneously isodense and
moderately enhanced after injection of contrast. This mass is
responsible of dilatation of the main bile duct (white arrow head) and
intrahepatic bile ducts (black arrow). There are associated
intraepithelial lymphnodes (black circle).
Image 2: MRI sections weighted in T2 (a), Diffusion (b) and T1
FATSAT after Gado (c): Pancreatic mass isosignal in T2, diffusion
hypersignal and moderately enhanced after gadolinium.
Image 3: Control abdominal scan: Coronal reconstruction (a) and
axial section (b) after injection of contrast at portal time: complete
disappearance of the pancreatic mass (white arrow).
Table 1: Clinical
characteristics, treatment and outcomes of literature reports of
pancreatic granulocytic sarcomas