References cited:
1. IPBES. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report
on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services .
https://zenodo.org/record/3553579 (2019) doi:10.5281/zenodo.3553579.
2. Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change. 7.d Paris Agreement. (2015).
3. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.
15/4. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. (2022).
4. McKinsey & Company & Nielsen IQ. Consumers Care about
Sustainability—and Back It up with Their Wallets .
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/consumers-care-about-sustainability-and-back-it-up-with-their-wallets&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1688750877223141&usg=AOvVaw0pk3JVzaxmX0-bYMUdpuHR
(2023).
5. PwC. Asset and Wealth Management Revolution 2022: Exponential
Expectations for ESG . www.pwc.com/awm-revolution-2022 (2022).
6. TNFD. The TNFD Nature-Related Risk and Opportunity Management
and Disclosure Framework Final Draft – Beta v0.4 . (2023).
7. SBTN. Technical Guidance – Step 1: Assess . (2023).
8. ENCORE. ENCORE https://encore.naturalcapital.finance/en.
9. WWF Biodiversity Risk Filter.
https://riskfilter.org/biodiversity/home.
10. GLOBIO - Global biodiversity model for policy support - homepage
| Global biodiversity model for policy support.
https://www.globio.info/.
11. TFCD. Guidance on Metrics, Targets, and Transition Plans .
(2021).
12. Pérez, L., Hunt, V., Samandari, H., Nuttall, R. & Biniek, K. Does
ESG really matter—and why? The McKinsey Quarterly (2022).
13. Guerry, A. D. et al. Natural capital and ecosystem services
informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 112 , 7348–7355 (2015).
14. Damania, R. et al. Nature’s Frontiers: Achieving
Sustainability, Efficiency, and Prosperity with Natural Capital . (The
World Bank, 2023). doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1923-0.
15. Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Mapping the planet’s critical
natural assets. Nat Ecol Evol 7 , 51–61 (2023).
16. Natural Capital Project. InVEST. Stanford University, University of
Minnesota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, The Nature Conservancy, World
Wildlife Fund, Stockholm Resilience Centre and the Royal Swedish Academy
of Sciences (2023).
17. Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F. & Rigobon, R. Aggregate Confusion: The
Divergence of ESG Ratings*. Review of Finance 26 ,
1315–1344 (2022).
18. Moran, D., Giljum, S., Kanemoto, K. & Godar, J. From Satellite to
Supply Chain: New Approaches Connect Earth Observation to Economic
Decisions. One Earth 3 , 5–8 (2020).
19. Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Life cycle assessment needs
predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services.Nat Commun 8 , 15065 (2017).
20. Patouillard, L. et al. Critical review and practical
recommendations to integrate the spatial dimension into life cycle
assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 177 , 398–412
(2018).
21. MSCI. MSCI ACWI Index (USD) Index Factsheet. (2023).
22. S&P Global. S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2022).
23. Hund, K., Porta, D. L., Fabregas, T. P., Laing, T. & Drexhage, J.Minerals for Climate Action: The Mineral Intensity of the Clean
Energy Transition . (2020).
24. IEA. Net Zero by 2050 - A Roadmap for the Global Energy
Sector . (2021).
25. Giljum, S. et al. A pantropical assessment of deforestation
caused by industrial mining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.119 , e2118273119 (2022).
26. Luckeneder, S., Giljum, S., Schaffartzik, A., Maus, V. & Tost, M.
Surge in global metal mining threatens vulnerable ecosystems.Global Environmental Change 69 , 102303 (2021).
27. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A.
B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Nature 403 , 853–858 (2000).
28. International Energy Agency. Emission Factors: Database
Documentation (2022 Edition) .
https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/emissions-factors-2022
(2022).
29. Planet Labs PBC. 2016-2023 Planet Labs PBC global quarterly
basemaps. (2023).
30. S&P Global. S&P Capital IQ Pro Metals and Mining. (2023).
31. Tallis, H., Kennedy, C. M., Ruckelshaus, M., Goldstein, J. &
Kiesecker, J. M. Mitigation for one & all: An integrated framework for
mitigation of development impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem
services. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 55 ,
21–34 (2015).
32. World Business Councile for Sustainable Development & World
Resources Institute. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate
Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition . (2004).
33. Stadler, K. et al. EXIOBASE 3. Zenodo
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5589597 (2021).
34. Walston, L. J. et al. Modeling the ecosystem services of
native vegetation management practices at solar energy facilities in the
Midwestern United States. Ecosystem Services 47 , 101227
(2021).
35. WWF & BCG. Building a Nature-Positive Energy Transformation:
Why a Low-Carbon Economy Is Better for People and Nature . (2023).
36. Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Global restoration opportunities
in tropical rainforest landscapes. Science Advances 5 ,
eaav3223 (2019).
37. Farjana, S. H., Huda, N., Parvez Mahmud, M. A. & Saidur, R. A
review on the impact of mining and mineral processing industries through
life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production231 , 1200–1217 (2019).
38. Schlingemann, F. P. & Stulz, R. M. Have exchange-listed firms
become less important for the economy? Journal of Financial
Economics 143 , 927–958 (2022).
39. Murphy, A. America’s Largest Private Companies 2022. Forbeshttps://www.forbes.com/lists/largest-private-companies/.
40. Maus, V. & Werner, T. T. Impacts for half of the world’s mining
areas are undocumented. Nature 625 , 26–29 (2024).
41. Nassar, R. et al. Quantifying CO2 Emissions From Individual
Power Plants From Space. Geophysical Research Letters44 , 10,045-10,053 (2017).
42. Dethier, E. N. et al. A global rise in alluvial mining
increases sediment load in tropical rivers. Nature 620 ,
787–793 (2023).
43. Galaz García, C. et al. The future of ecosystem assessments
is automation, collaboration, and artificial intelligence.Environ. Res. Lett. 18 , 011003 (2023).
44. European Space Agency. ESA CCI Land Cover. (2019).
45. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. (2019).
46. IUCN. A Global Standard for the Identification of Key
Biodiversity Areas, Version 1.0 .
https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259 (2016).
47. BirldLife International. Digital boundaries of Key Biodiversity
Areas from the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. Developed by
the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the
Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation
International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment
Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust,
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society
and World Wildlife Fund. (2019).
48. Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Degradation in carbon stocks near
tropical forest edges. Nat Commun 6 , 10158 (2015).
49. Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting
impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances 1 ,
e1500052 (2015).
50. Natural Capital Project. PyGeoprocessing. Stanford University,
University of Minnesota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, The Nature
Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, Stockholm Resilience Centre and the
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. (2023).
51. MSCI. GICS® - Global Industry Classification Standard.
https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/indexes/gics.