CONCLUSIONS
Based on the aforementioned results we consider RA a valid alternative
to GA for laparoscopic gynecological surgery: in accordance with the
goals of the minimally invasive surgery era, RA demonstrated to decrease
the impact of surgical stress and to guarantee a quicker recovery
without compromising, at the same time, surgical outcomes. As well as
different surgical approaches could be selected based on patients
characteristics and diseases, accordingly, anesthesia’s technique should
be tailored on patients motivations and conditions. However further
studies are required to evaluate more complex and longer surgical
procedures.