REFERENCES
1. Bhavsar A, Verma S. Anatomic Imaging of the Prostate. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2014;2014:1–9. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/728539/
2. Bonekamp D, Jacobs M, El-Khouli R, Stoianovici D, Macura K. Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions. Radiographics. 2011;31(3):677–703.
3. Raskolnikov D, George AK, Rais-bahrami S, Turkbey B, Siddiqui MM, Shakir NA, et al. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy in Stratifying Men for Risk of Extracapsular Extension at Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol [Internet]. 2015; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.072
4. Rosenkrantz AB, Shanbhogue AK, Wang A, Kong MX, Babb JS, Taneja SS. Length of capsular contact for diagnosing extraprostatic extension on prostate MRI: Assessment at an optimal threshold. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43(4):990–7.
5. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):746–57.
6. Woo S, Cho JY eo., Kim SY ou., Kim SH yu. Extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with equivocal findings on T2-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(2):W168–75.
7. Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2016;69(1):16–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052
8. Baco E, Rud E, Vlatkovic L, Svindland A, Eggesbø HB, Hung AJ, et al. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging determined tumor contact length for extracapsular extension of prostate cancer. J Urol [Internet]. 2015;193(2):466–72. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.084
9. Woo S, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Length of capsular contact on prostate MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension: Which is the most optimal sequence? Acta radiol. 2017;58(4):489–97.
10. Bakir B, Vural M. Be Predicted by Tumor-Capsule Relationship With International. 2020;(March):1–9.
11. Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2019;0232:1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033
12. Tumor DE, Costa DN, Passoni NM, Leyendecker JR, Grewal H. Versus Qualitative Descriptors and. 2018;(May):1–7.
13. Van Holsbeeck A, Degroote A, De Wever L et al. Staging of prostatic carcinoma at 1 . 5-T MRI : correlation of a simplified MRI exam with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens. 2016;(May):1–7.
14. Rud E, Diep L, Baco E. A prospective study evaluating indirect MRI ‑ signs for the prediction of extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer : tumor volume , tumor contact length and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient. World J Urol [Internet]. 2018;(0123456789). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2171-4