TABLE 6. Prediction model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia TABLE 6. Prediction model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia TABLE 6. Prediction model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia TABLE 6. Prediction model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia TABLE 6. Prediction model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia TABLE 6. Prediction model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia TABLE 6. Prediction model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia
TG cut-off, mmol/L AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity Specificity χ2 P
6-8th week 1.12 0.759 (0.721-0.797) 67.7% 70.7% 6.156 0.630
16th week 1.93 0.750 (0.711-0.789) 61.7% 75.9% 10.382 0.239
24th week 2.35 0.738 (0.699-0.776) 66.2% 73.4% 9.786 0.280
36th week 3.08 0.708 (0.669-0.747) 70.1% 63.8% 21.917 0.050
AUC and its 95% CIs were based on ROC curves of the predictive model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia. Cutoff points of serum TG level at each gestational week, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the point nearest to the top-left most corner of the ROC curves, which was the point with the biggest Youden Index. χ2 and P value were calculated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P value of > 0.05 was considered as the prediction model with good calibration. AUC and its 95% CIs were based on ROC curves of the predictive model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia. Cutoff points of serum TG level at each gestational week, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the point nearest to the top-left most corner of the ROC curves, which was the point with the biggest Youden Index. χ2 and P value were calculated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P value of > 0.05 was considered as the prediction model with good calibration. AUC and its 95% CIs were based on ROC curves of the predictive model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia. Cutoff points of serum TG level at each gestational week, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the point nearest to the top-left most corner of the ROC curves, which was the point with the biggest Youden Index. χ2 and P value were calculated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P value of > 0.05 was considered as the prediction model with good calibration. AUC and its 95% CIs were based on ROC curves of the predictive model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia. Cutoff points of serum TG level at each gestational week, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the point nearest to the top-left most corner of the ROC curves, which was the point with the biggest Youden Index. χ2 and P value were calculated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P value of > 0.05 was considered as the prediction model with good calibration. AUC and its 95% CIs were based on ROC curves of the predictive model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia. Cutoff points of serum TG level at each gestational week, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the point nearest to the top-left most corner of the ROC curves, which was the point with the biggest Youden Index. χ2 and P value were calculated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P value of > 0.05 was considered as the prediction model with good calibration. AUC and its 95% CIs were based on ROC curves of the predictive model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia. Cutoff points of serum TG level at each gestational week, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the point nearest to the top-left most corner of the ROC curves, which was the point with the biggest Youden Index. χ2 and P value were calculated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P value of > 0.05 was considered as the prediction model with good calibration. AUC and its 95% CIs were based on ROC curves of the predictive model of gestational TG level on postpartum hypertriglyceridemia. Cutoff points of serum TG level at each gestational week, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the point nearest to the top-left most corner of the ROC curves, which was the point with the biggest Youden Index. χ2 and P value were calculated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P value of > 0.05 was considered as the prediction model with good calibration.