Results

Theoretical basis

In this research, we are working on the definition of the mental health of medical staff in National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology during the COVID-19 pandemic is
“A state of mind characterized by emotional well-being good, behavioral adjustment, relative freedom from anxiety and disabling symptoms, and a capacity to establish constructive relationships and cope with the ordinary demands and stresses of life” ( VandenBos et al., 2007)
By people whose job is to protect and improve the health of their communities in National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE) during the pandemic, the disease caused by a new coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2.
Our progress on researching the reality of the mental health of healthcare professionals in the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology through three manifestations: the ability to manage emotions, the ability to deal with challenges and demands, and the ability to maintain interest in the COVID-19 pandemic are based on the theoretical foundation we have outlined above, as well as the complicated situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also look at the impact of four factors: sleeping quality, emotional regulation, interest retention, and the capacity to deal with demands and obstacles.

Practical mental health status

There are 100 persons with normal mental health status (85.5%), 16 individuals with mild mental health status (13.7%), and 1 person with moderate mental health status (0.9%) among the 117 responses. The results of the mental health status of healthcare workers at the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology were calculated and have an average of 0,34 (±0,34); the average score is not very separated, but the results returned have the unity we’re looking for; which falls within the range of having normal mental health status.
To find out more, we calculated the data of 13,7% of people with mild disorders and 0,9% of those with moderate disorders in their mental health condition. We also discovered that their mental health average score is 1,02, indicating that they have a minor problem.
In the next part, we evaluate the sleeping quality of the healthcare workers in the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, there are 38 people who don’t have sleeping disorders (32,5%) and 79 people with a sleeping disorder, which takes 67,5%.
We don’t monitor every mental health symptom; instead, we evaluate the disorder of those manifestations based on the reality that only a minor percentage of people suffer from mental illness. The ability to maintain interest in work and relationships, as well as the ability to control emotions, are both rated with the same percentages on the rating scale. They each had 103 individuals on the normal scale, with 9 persons having mild disorders in both skills, 4 having moderate disorders, and just 1 having severe disorders. None of the disorders were described as being extremely severe, further more data be displayed in Table 2.
On the other hand, the ability to deal with challenges and demands revealed a different result: 98 persons scored normal, accounting for 83.8% of the total, while 4 persons were identified as having a minor condition. There are 12 persons on the scale of moderate disorder, which is three times greater than the other two abilities, which each took 10,3%. Two persons are said to be suffering from serious disorders, and 1 is said to be suffering from a very severe disorder in their ability to cope with challenges and demands.

Affect factors of the mental health status

In the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, demographic variables had no statistically significant influence on the mental health of healthcare professionals. This is reflected in the comparison outcomes, which demonstrate that there is no statistically significant difference in mental health across participants of different genders, ages, marital status, and frequency of exposure to different infections.
The results of the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology’s assessment of the correlations between psychological factors: emotional control, ability to complete challenges and demands, ability to maintain interest in work and relationships, and sleep quality with the mental health of medical staff are positive and high. The majority of the capacity to manage emotions, fulfill difficulties and demands, and retain an interest in work are all high, and the average mental health score is also high.
When we compare the average score of mental health status among departments, we discover that there are statistically significant differences in mental health status across function units, service units, and specialized units, s  Specialize units are higher than function and service units.  We performed another comparison on the factors that impact mental health status since the average scores of mental health status between departments differed statistically significantly. The first is the ability to manage emotions; the specialty unit has the greatest score in this area, with a score of 6,73, followed by the service unit, which receives a score of 5,95.
The psychological elements of these 14,8 percent of persons with mental health problems have an impact, which includes the ability to control emotions, the ability to complete challenges and demands, and the capacity to retain an interest in work and relationships. The first skill shows just average connections with a mental health state, while the next two are both strong and favorable.