The government regulation issued in 2017 that regulate the production,
distribustion and the price decision toward the mining product. The
regulation explain the division of the share between the Central
Government and Local Government. The share division for Indonesian
Government 51% and foreign investor 49%. The regulation is issued
since there is a major issue on the management of the mining products
and the unfairness of the prices. Another issue is related to the
management of the profit to the stakeholders including the environmental
issu handling and the local community welfare.Research MethodologyThe paradigm of this research will be on critical point of view based on
the critical discourse analysis. Denzin and Lincoln (2011: 119)
explained that qualitative Paradigm will depend on human knowledge in
deriving the truth. The truth is a very subjective points of view that
basis on the certain observation or in – depth analysis of the text.
The phenomena in the society will help the researchers to understand the
cases point of view and the possible solution and strategies that might
be applied to overcome the problems. Further, in critical research, the
truth is deriving by finding out the social injustice phenomena that
strives the researcher in understanding the condition and obstacles that
found in the society. The critical itself is aimed to deliver the social
transformation in society through delivering new concept on social
condition, psychology, or even the language. On critical discourse
analysis, the concept and context of language usage is handling the
important role in revealing the social injustice in society. The object
of the research is PT Timah Indonesia that is located in Bangka
Belitung.
The main object of the research is the mining practices of PT Timah
Indonesia as the reflection of the corporate capitalism as reflected in
PP No. 1 2017. The reflection of the corporate capitalism can be
analyzed through the cases toward the stakeholders. The regulation is
analyzed through various contexts to understand the situation and
condition. The Critical Discourse Analysis will be focused on the
political discourse analysis. Van Dijk ( 2015: 360) explained that
critical discourse analysis on political discourse would deeply analyse
on the enactment, reproduction and legitimization of power and
domination. The analysis of the political language will be applied to
reveal the corporate capitalism practices of PT Timah toward the
stakeholders. The Unit analysis is the Govermnment Regulation that
contain main strategies of political decision for PT Timah through PP No
1 2017.Result and DiscussionDiscusing about PT Timah will be closely related with the regulation of
power between PT Timah and the stakeholder. The historical background of
PT Timah started form the Dutch Colonialization and as the implication
of the regulation system is the centralization of the control and asset.
The Government Regulation in 1999 emerged the changes of the
centralization system to local regulation system. The participation of
the local government give another alternatives to the province to handle
the tin mining. The various type of the stakeholders appeared as the
local government open the concept of „ free-mining‟ zone for the local
community in overcoming the economic crisis ( Ibrahim: 2018). The
corporate capitalism practices by PT Timah can be shown in implementing
the stakeholder relation between PT Timah, Regulators, Local
Governments, Customers, and Local Community.
The mapping of the stakeholders has been changed through out the
shareholder meeting in 2017. The prior condition of the stakeholder
relation between PT Timah and the stakeholder in this case the local
government and local community become the major problem to discuss as
explained in the one of the reasearch entitled Tin and Authorithycontestation : Government, People , and Businessmen in chronical
Tin Management ( Ibrahim : 2018). The authority of the Tin Mining
ownership based on the research owned by The Central Government and one
of private company. The regulation of power between the Central
Government and the local government put the middle rank of the
stakeholders that get involve in the mining production. Those
stakeholders are the capital players, miners and the brokers. Until 2017
, Indonesian government put the deepest concern on the capital players
and the monopoly process of production and distribution. The implication
of the tin mining process and production create various effects such as
the illegal mining and the environmental destruction. The limitation of
the workplace and the opportunities and also the environmental
destruction urge the local communities to conduct the illegal mining.
Take a deep considerations on the implications of the production of the
tin mining, Indonesian Government started to review the position of the
PT Timah and its process of production. The changes of the Board of the
Directors on December 2017 and the changes of the organization
structures that urge Pt Timah to join the Holding with Inalum. The
changes of the structure nad the Board of Directors is initiated by the
issue of the Government Regulation or Peraturan Pemerintah No 1 2017
about the investors and the regulation in selling the mineral and coal
mining products. Based on the Government Regulation or Peraturan
Pemerintah issued by Indonesian Government , PP No 1 2017 about the
mining regulation and the production of the tin. This regulation is also
explain the stakeholders mapping for the tin distribution. The
regulation mentioned the changes on the agreement between the Central
Government and The Local Government. The major percentage of the
combination between the central government and local government will be
up 51% and open for foreign investorfor about 49%. The price of the
production will ,be decided from various partuies. Based on the
regulation the prices of production and selling will be decided with
central Government in this case the minister of Mineral Mining and the
local government, in this case the governor.
The Government regulation gives the changes for PT Timah in improving
the organizational structure. The implications from the organizational
structure is the re – mapping of the stakeholders, those are the
regulator that is related to the central government , the local
government, the customers and the local community.PT Timah applied the
meaning embedded in the Peraturan Pemerintah to support the Local
Government in improving the production of the tin mining as well as the
improvement of the stakeholders welfare. The implementation of the
Peraturan pemerintah No 1 2017 can be shown on the PT Timah Website.
The holding functions as the major information resources of the mining
practices to be repoted to the central Government. This holding ifs
functioned to return the regulation power to the government since PT
Timah is considered as the governmental company ( BUMN) so that the
state in this case the central government has absolut power to give the
control of the tin mining process. The scope of the authoriety between
the central government and local government is on the function and role
as partners in decision making in the company. The contribution of of
the central government and local government is considered as the
stakeholder collaborative process in achieving the maximum benefit of
the tin mining process.
In the article 97 verses 4 and 5 , the central hovernment declare tyheir
position of the ownership of the Tin Mining and claim it as the State
Company and the central government will share the interest to the Local
Government as one of the action in having the collaboration between
Central Government and Local Government. As explained earlier that mthe
system of the collaboration between the Central Government and Local
Government is placing PT Timah under the holding company Inalum. Based
on the regulation, the holding will have contribution in deciding the
market and the rate of the price.
The authorithy of Central Government is also shown in the scope of
market as explained in the website. The central Governemt put the
condition that only companies joined in Indonesian Commodity and
Derrivative Exchage. The Central Government put the authority in
choosing the customer and distributor. However, to maintain and improve
the welfare of the production, as stated earlier in the PP no 1 2017
article 97 verse 2 the major ownership of the share will be the
Indonesian Governement.ConclusionBy implementing the PP No 1 2017 , the Central Governemnt return their
power in owning the major share of PT Timah Indonesia. The position of
the local government is considered as partnership in dealing with local
stakeholder. The PP no 1 2017 showing the urgency of PT Timah to revise
the regulation power. Activity coordination with local stakeholder is
mean government aware about a power relation as suistainable bussines
practice (Bolton and Landell, 2015). The implementation of the authority
is by placing PT Timah under holding company Inalum. The basic function
of the holding company is to centralize the information and updates as
well as the place in creating and delivering the policy to other
stakeholder. This is consisten with notion the social relations of
production Foucault’s (1980) ‘capillaries’ of power relationships,
challenging global and hierarchical structures of society from below,
then a more complex and nuanced representation of the struggle over the
discourse of sustainable development emerges.
The Company position above is showing the authority and the ownership of
PT Timah has a changed, this is reflection of Sustainability as a
socially instituted process of adaptive change. The stakeholders mapping
changes into certain categories, those are Regulators (Central
Government), Government (Local Government), Customer that distributed by
the Indonesian Commodity and Derivative exchange and the Local
Community.Bibliography Denzin, Norman.K & Lincoln, Yvonna .S. 2011. Qualitative
Research. SAGE Publication,Inc.California.USA
Denzin, Norman .K. Research Act. 1978. McGraw-Hill. USA
Gill, Robert,Dr. Public Relations and the New Stakeholder
Management Environment. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, Vol 4, No.10. October 2014.
Griffin,EM. 2011. First Look at Communication Theory.McGraw-Hill. New York. USA.
Hayek.A.Fredrich. 1954. Capitalism and Historian.University of
Chicago Press.
Chicago.
Hemphill, Thomas. “The „creative capitalism‟ corporate governance model
: How radical an approach to modern capitalism ?” International Journal
of Law and management . Vol 52 no 2, 2010 . pg 110.
Ibrahim. Bangka Tin, and The Collapse of the State Power. Journal of Law
and Social Sciences. 2016
Ibrahim. Tin and Authority Contestation, Government, People, and
Businessmenin Chronical Tin Management. International journal of
management and Applied Sciences. Vol.1 January 2018.
Luoma-aho, Vilma. Understanding Stakeholder
Engagement:Faith-holders,Hateholders&Fae-holders. Research
Journal of the Institute for Public Relation,Vol2,no.1 . 2015
Mayer, Don. “Corporate Citizenship and Trustworthy capitalism : Co
creating a more peaceful planet.”. American Business Law Journal, 2007.
Pg 237.
Dianne Bolton* and Terry Landells Reconceptualizing Power Relations as
Sustainable Business Practice, Published online in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com),2015;605