Conclusion
In our review, we acknowledge the presence of certain limitations that require consideration. Firstly, the COVID-19 outbreak took place over two years ago, resulting in a wealth of detailed descriptions. This abundance of information presents challenges related to the relevance and reliability of the data, as the assessment tools used may vary considerably based on various factors. Secondly, given the novelty of the disease, the evaluation of long-term outcomes and potential sequelae necessitates ongoing follow-up studies. Thirdly, it’s important to note that there are often multiple viral infections resembling COVID-19 circulating within the same class or school environment, which can complicate diagnosis. Additionally, the treatment strategy for children may warrant further discussion and cautious consideration.
In summary, it is evident that the pediatric population tends to experience a less severe response to viral infections. The explanations for this phenomenon are diverse, and each comes with its set of challenges. Moreover, these explanations can evolve as new cohorts of patients are studied. The presence of a higher number of asymptomatic and mild cases adds complexity to the diagnosis and the management of infection sources. Currently, the primary diagnostic criteria rely on the presence of typical ground glass opacities on chest CT scans, epidemiological suspicions, and the tracing of contacts.