Conclusion
In our review, we acknowledge the presence of certain limitations that
require consideration. Firstly, the COVID-19 outbreak took place over
two years ago, resulting in a wealth of detailed descriptions. This
abundance of information presents challenges related to the relevance
and reliability of the data, as the assessment tools used may vary
considerably based on various factors. Secondly, given the novelty of
the disease, the evaluation of long-term outcomes and potential sequelae
necessitates ongoing follow-up studies. Thirdly, it’s important to note
that there are often multiple viral infections resembling COVID-19
circulating within the same class or school environment, which can
complicate diagnosis. Additionally, the treatment strategy for children
may warrant further discussion and cautious consideration.
In summary, it is evident that the pediatric population tends to
experience a less severe response to viral infections. The explanations
for this phenomenon are diverse, and each comes with its set of
challenges. Moreover, these explanations can evolve as new cohorts of
patients are studied. The presence of a higher number of asymptomatic
and mild cases adds complexity to the diagnosis and the management of
infection sources. Currently, the primary diagnostic criteria rely on
the presence of typical ground glass opacities on chest CT scans,
epidemiological suspicions, and the tracing of contacts.