According to ESP profile analysis, in Figure 2(a), there is a strong
interaction between DBU and EG, the distance of 35H and 21N in
34O−35H···21N configuration is 1.704 Å. Surprisingly, there exist two
type configurations with different strengths between DBU and EG (see
Figure 2(d)): type I is 34O−35H···21N configuration with 1.718 Å
distance between 35H and 21N, and type II is 46O−47H···17N configuration
with 2.036 Å between 47H and 17N, indicating that the intermolecular
interaction of type I is stronger than that of type II. Meanwhile,
combining ESP analysis, these two configurations correspond to four
possible interaction sites O for H2S absorption due to
the influence of force. In Figure 2(b), one spike appeared at the region
of sign (λ 2)ρ < -0.02,
indicating that there exists an H-bond,35corresponding to the blue circle at the H of -OH in EG and the
in DBU (Figure 2(c)). It is worth noting in Figure 2(e) that two spikes
appeared at the region of sign (λ 2)ρ< -0.02, meaning two H-bonds with different strengths, and
gradient isosurfaces information of a blue circle and a cake appear
between H of -OH in EG and two Ns of in DBU (Figure 2(f)). The spikes in
the region of sign (λ 2)ρ ≈ 0 in Figure
2(b) and e as well as the green region in the gradient isosurfaces in
Figure 2(c) and f mean the vdW force interaction. The calculated
Enthalpy change of forming DBU-EG and DBU-2EG by DBU and EG are -10.3
and 24.9 kJ/mol (the calculation of Enthalpy change is given in
Supplementary 2), respectively. Therefore, the interaction between DBU
and EG can form a strong H-bond when the molar ratio is 1:1, and double
H- bonds with different strengths can be formed when the molar ratio is
1:2.
As shown in Figure 2(g) and (j), the H2S were positioned
at different orientations of the absorbent under the electrostatic
interaction causative by H-bond from the DBU-EG and DBU-2EG. In Figure
2(h), there are two new spikes appeared at the region of sign
(λ 2)ρ < and ≈-0.02, indicating
two H-bonds of different strength occurs in DBU-EG, corresponding to the
blue disc appears between 34O and 39H, and the iron blue disc between
36O and 42H in gradient isosurface map in Figure 2(i), respectively.
Meanwhile, in Figure 2(k), a new spike appeared at sign
(λ 2) ρ < and ≈ -0.02 compared to
Figure 2(h), indicating that there are four H-bond with different
strengths formed between DBU-2EG multimer absorbent and
H2S corresponding to the blue disc appearing between 34O
and 55H, and the iron blue disc between 36O and 58H, 46O and 53H, 44O
and 50H in Figure 2(l), but the strength is relatively weak compared to
DBU-2EG. Therefore, RDG and gradient isosurface map information analysis
are consistent with the speculative result of ESP. The calculated
Enthalpy change of H2S absorption by DBU-2EG multimer
absorbent is -24.1 kJ/mol (the calculation of Enthalpy change is given
in Supplementary 2). However, two H-bonds are formed between DBU-EG and
H2S, meaning that the binding capacity of DBU-EG to
H2S is weaker than that of DBU-2EG. While in Figure
2(k), the H-bonds in DBU-2EG-4H2S are slightly moved
close to sign (λ 2)ρ ≈ 0 relatives to
DBU-2EG, indicating that the H-bonds in DBU-2EG become weak after the
absorption H2S through O attracting H in the absorption
process. In addition, the vdW force has become stronger between
DBU-2EG-4H2S compared to DBU-EG-2H2S,
corresponding to the green region in Figure 2(i) and (l). Therefore,
different from DBU-EG, the double H-bonds DBU-2EG is more beneficial for
the absorption of H2S.