\documentclass[10pt]{article}

\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\usepackage[section]{placeins}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{breakcites}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{hyphenat}





\PassOptionsToPackage{hyphens}{url}
\usepackage[colorlinks = true,
            linkcolor = blue,
            urlcolor  = blue,
            citecolor = blue,
            anchorcolor = blue]{hyperref}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\makeatletter
\patchcmd\@combinedblfloats{\box\@outputbox}{\unvbox\@outputbox}{}{%
  \errmessage{\noexpand\@combinedblfloats could not be patched}%
}%
\makeatother


\usepackage{natbib}




\renewenvironment{abstract}
  {{\bfseries\noindent{\abstractname}\par\nobreak}\footnotesize}
  {\bigskip}

\titlespacing{\section}{0pt}{*3}{*1}
\titlespacing{\subsection}{0pt}{*2}{*0.5}
\titlespacing{\subsubsection}{0pt}{*1.5}{0pt}


\usepackage{authblk}


\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[space]{grffile}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{booktabs,array,multirow}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amssymb}
\providecommand\citet{\cite}
\providecommand\citep{\cite}
\providecommand\citealt{\cite}
% You can conditionalize code for latexml or normal latex using this.
\newif\iflatexml\latexmlfalse
\providecommand{\tightlist}{\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}}%

\AtBeginDocument{\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.PDF,.eps,.EPS,.png,.PNG,.tif,.TIF,.jpg,.JPG,.jpeg,.JPEG}}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ngerman,polish,english]{babel}



\usepackage{float}








\begin{document}

\title{Understanding Microbial Ecology through Gene Regulatory Networks}



\author[1]{Ali Yetgin}%
\affil[1]{Cukurova University}%


\vspace{-1em}



  
  \date{June 13, 2024}


\begingroup
\let\center\flushleft
\let\endcenter\endflushleft
\maketitle
\endgroup





\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{abstract}
Microbial communities are complex networks of microorganisms that
interact with each other and their environment. Understanding the
functional roles of individual species and their interactions is
challenging. High-throughput sequencing has provided valuable insights
into microbial communities, but the vast amounts of data generated make
deciphering mechanisms difficult. Gene regulatory networks (GRNs)
provide a powerful framework for studying the functional roles of
individual genes and their interactions in complex biological systems.
In microbial ecology, GRNs can be used to identify key regulatory genes
and their targets involved in ecological processes. By integrating
genomic and transcriptomic data with environmental metadata, GRNs can
reveal the genetic architecture of microbial communities. This review
provides an overview of the application of GRNs in microbial ecology and
discusses the challenges and opportunities of using this approach. Case
studies demonstrate the potential of GRNs in uncovering novel insights
into microbial community structure and function. Integration of GRNs
with other omics approaches and environmental metadata holds great
promise in advancing our understanding of microbial ecology and its
relevance to human health and environmental sustainability.%
\end{abstract}%



\sloppy


\textbf{Introduction}

Microbial ecology is the study of microorganisms and their interactions
with each other and with their environment~(Barton~and~Northup, 2011).
It includes the investigation of microbial diversity, community
structure and function, and the roles that microorganisms play in
biogeochemical cycles, nutrient cycling, and bioremediation. Gene
regulatory networks (GRNs) are sets of genes and their regulatory
interactions that govern the expression of genes in a cell or
organism~(Arda~and~Walhout, 2010). GRNs can be used to model the complex
regulatory mechanisms that underlie biological processes, including
development, metabolism, and environmental responses. In microbial
ecology, GRNs can be constructed to identify key regulatory genes and
their targets that are involved in various ecological processes, such as
nutrient cycling, bioremediation, and pathogenesis. By integrating
genomic and transcriptomic data with environmental metadata, GRNs can
reveal the underlying genetic architecture of microbial
communities~(Hansen, 2006).

Microbial ecology is a multidisciplinary field that incorporates
knowledge from microbiology, ecology, evolution, and environmental
science. Microbes are ubiquitous in nature, and they play critical roles
in nutrient cycling, decomposition, symbiosis, and disease.
Understanding microbial ecology is essential for developing sustainable
solutions to environmental problems~and promoting human health. GRNs
provide a framework for studying the interactions between genes and
their regulatory factors~(Haque~et al., 2019). GRNs can help identify
genes that are involved in specific biological processes and reveal the
regulatory mechanisms that underlie gene expression. In microbial
ecology, GRNs can be used to identify key regulatory genes and their
targets that are involved in various ecological processes, such as
nutrient cycling, bioremediation, and pathogenesis. By integrating
genomic and transcriptomic data with environmental metadata, GRNs can be
constructed to reveal the underlying genetic architecture of microbial
communities. GRNs are powerful tools for understanding the functional
roles of individual genes and their interactions in complex biological
systems, including microbial communities~(Deng~et al., 2012). The study
of microbial ecology through GRNs represents an exciting and rapidly
growing field that holds significant promise for advancing our
understanding of the complex interactions between microorganisms and
their environment.

The study of microbial ecology through GRNs is an important approach for
understanding the complex interactions between microorganisms and their
environment. Microorganisms play crucial roles in biogeochemical cycles,
nutrient cycling, and bioremediation, as well as in human health and
disease~(Mart\selectlanguage{ngerman}ínez-Espinosa, 2020). However, the complexity of microbial
communities makes it difficult to fully understand their functional
roles and regulatory mechanisms. GRNs provide a powerful tool for
unraveling the complex genetic architecture of microbial communities and
identifying key regulatory genes and their targets. This information can
lead to the development of more efficient and sustainable solutions for
environmental problems, as well as better strategies for treating and
preventing microbial infections. Additionally, the study of microbial
ecology through GRNs can enhance our understanding of evolutionary
processes and microbial~diversity and~contribute to the development of
new biotechnologies~(Berg~et al., 2017). Overall, the importance of
studying microbial ecology through GRNs lies in its potential to uncover
new insights into the roles of microorganisms in shaping our world and
their relevance to human health and environmental sustainability.

The use of GRNs in microbial ecology can also help to identify
functional roles of specific microbial species within a community, and
how they interact with each other and their environment~(Abram,
2015;~Rastogi~and Sani, 2011). GRNs can provide insights into the
mechanisms behind the ecological functions of microbial communities,
such as nutrient cycling, bioremediation, and pathogenesis. By studying
the GRNs of microbial communities in different environmental contexts,
it is possible to gain a better understanding of how microbial
ecosystems adapt to changing conditions. Furthermore, advances in
high-throughput sequencing technologies and data analysis methods have
greatly increased the amount of data available for the construction of
GRNs~(Reuter~et al., 2015). This has led to the development of new
approaches for data integration and visualization, which enable the
identification of complex interactions and feedback mechanisms within
microbial communities. The use of GRNs in microbial ecology is therefore
a rapidly evolving field, with many opportunities for collaboration and
innovation. In summary, the study of microbial ecology through GRNs is
of great importance for understanding the complex interactions between
microorganisms and their environment. It can provide insights into the
functional roles of specific microbial species, the mechanisms
underlying ecological processes, and the adaptation of microbial
ecosystems~to changing conditions. The use of GRNs in microbial ecology
represents a promising approach for developing sustainable slutions to
environmental problems and improving human health~(Wu~et al., 2014).

The review will first define microbial ecology and GRNs, highlighting
the key concepts and approaches used in this field. It will then discuss
the importance of studying microbial ecology through GRNs, including the
potential for identifying functional roles of specific microbial species
and the mechanisms underlying ecological processes. The review will also
highlight the advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies and
data analysis methods that have enabled the construction of more
comprehensive GRNs for microbial communities. Finally, the review will
conclude by discussing the future directions and challenges in the
field, including the need for better integration of data from different
sources and the development of new approaches for data visualization and
interpretation. Overall, this review aims to provide a comprehensive and
up-to-date overview of the use of GRNs in microbial ecology and its
potential for advancing our understanding of microbial communities and
their interactions with the environment.

\textbf{The Application of GRNs in Microbial Ecology}

The application of GRNs in microbial ecology has become increasingly
important in recent years~(MacNeil~and~Walhout, 2011). One major
application of GRNs is in the analysis of microbial communities, where
they provide a powerful tool for identifying key regulatory genes and
understanding the functional roles of specific microbial species. For
example, GRNs have been used to study the metabolic interactions between
different microorganisms in soil, revealing the complex regulatory
networks involved in nutrient cycling and soil health. Another important
application of GRNs in microbial ecology is in the identification of new
biotechnologies, such as the development of novel enzymes and metabolic
pathways~for the production of~biofuels and other sustainable
products~(Erickson~and~Winters, 2012). By identifying the key genes and
regulatory factors involved in these processes, GRNs can help to
optimize the efficiency of biotechnological processes and reduce their
environmental impact.

GRNs can also be used to study the mechanisms underlying ecological
processes, such as bioremediation and the cycling of nutrients, and to
develop more sustainable solutions to environmental problems. For
example, by identifying the microbial communities involved in the
degradation of pollutants in contaminated soil and developing strategies
to enhance their activity, GRNs can contribute to the development of
more effective bioremediation technologies~(Pande~et al., 2020). The
application of GRNs in microbial ecology holds great promise for
advancing our understanding of microbial communities and their
interactions with the environment, and for developing new
biotechnologies and sustainable solutions to environmental problems.

\textbf{Table 1.} ~Advantages of using GRNs in microbial ecology.\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{longtable}[]{@{}llll@{}}
\toprule
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
\textbf{Advantage}\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
\textbf{Description}\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
\textbf{Example}\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
\textbf{Reference}\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\midrule
\endhead
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identification of key regulatory genes and their targets\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can reveal the regulatory mechanisms that control gene expression
in microbial communities, identifying key regulatory genes and their
targets.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identifying the regulatory network controlling the production of
antibiotics in Streptomyces bacteria.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Urem~et al., 2016\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Uncovering the genetic architecture of microbial communities\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can help to identify the genetic basis of microbial traits and the
interactions between genes, providing a more comprehensive understanding
of the genetic architecture of microbial communities.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Mapping the gene interactions involved in nitrogen fixation in a soil
microbiome.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Epihov~et al., 2021\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identification of functional roles of specific microbial species\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can help to identify the functional roles of specific microbial
species within a community, shedding light on their ecological functions
and interactions with other community members.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identifying the metabolic pathways of a specific bacterial species
involved in the degradation of hydrocarbons in an oil spill.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Dombrowski~et al., 2016\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Understanding the mechanisms underlying ecological processes\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying ecological
processes, such as nutrient cycling and bioremediation, enabling a more
detailed understanding of microbial ecosystem functioning.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identifying the regulatory networks controlling the uptake and
assimilation of nitrogen in a microbial community involved in nitrogen
cycling.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Mooshammer~et al., 2014\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Enhanced understanding of microbial diversity and evolution\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can provide insights into the evolution of microbial communities
and the mechanisms driving microbial diversity.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Studying the evolution of gene regulation in bacterial lineages from
different environments.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Babu~et al., 2006\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Development of new biotechnologies\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can help to identify novel enzymes and metabolic pathways with
potential biotechnological applications.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identifying the genes and pathways involved in the production of
biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Velvizhi~et al., 2022\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Integration of data from different sources\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can integrate data from multiple sources, including transcriptomic,
proteomic, and metabolomic data,~enabling a more comprehensive
understanding of microbial communities.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Integrating transcriptomic and proteomic data to identify the key genes
and proteins involved in~microbial interactions in a soil
microbiome.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Saraiva~et al., 2021\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identification of complex interactions and feedback mechanisms within
microbial communities\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can reveal the complex interactions and feedback mechanisms between
genes and regulatory factors within microbial communities.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identifying the feedback mechanisms involved in the regulation of
virulence genes in pathogenic bacteria.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Yarwood~et al., 2001\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Potential for developing sustainable solutions to environmental
problems\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can provide insights into the functional roles of microbial
communities in biogeochemical cycles and bioremediation, enabling the
development of more sustainable solutions to environmental
problems.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identifying the microbial communities involved in the degradation of
pollutants in contaminated~soil and~developing strategies to enhance
their activity.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Abraham~et al., 2002\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Improved strategies for treating and preventing microbial
infections\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can provide insights into the molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis,
enabling the development of more effective strategies for treating and
preventing microbial infections.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Identifying the regulatory networks controlling the expression of
virulence genes in bacterial~pathogens and~developing new approaches to
target these networks.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Kreikemeyer~et al., 2003\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Better adaptation of microbial ecosystems to changing conditions\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
GRNs can reveal how microbial communities adapt to changing
environmental conditions, enabling a better understanding of the
resilience and stability of microbial ecosystems.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Studying the adaptive responses of microbial communities to changes in
temperature or nutrient availability.\strut
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\columnwidth}\raggedright\strut
Wallenstein~and~Hall, 2012\strut
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
\bottomrule
\end{longtable}

GRNs are powerful tools that have been increasingly used in microbial
ecology to understand the complex interactions and dynamics among
microbial communities. GRNs offer several advantages over traditional
approaches in microbial ecology, such as the ability to identify key
regulatory genes and their targets, to uncover regulatory mechanisms
that underlie the functional diversity of microbial communities, and to
predict the behavior of microbial populations under different
environmental conditions (Table 1). Moreover, GRNs can provide insights
into the evolution of microbial communities, the role of horizontal gene
transfer in shaping their structure and function, and the potential for
engineering microbial communities for biotechnological applications. In
this way, GRNs represent a valuable tool for advancing our understanding
of the ecological principles that govern microbial communities and their
applications in biotechnology.

The process of constructing GRNs in microbial ecology typically involves
a combination of experimental and computational methods. The first step
is to collect data on the expression of genes and proteins in the
microbial community of interest, which can be done using techniques such
as RNA sequencing, microarrays, and mass spectrometry. This data is then
used to identify candidate genes and proteins that may be involved in
regulatory interactions within the community. Once candidate genes and
proteins have been identified, the next step is to experimentally
validate their regulatory interactions. This can be done using
techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and yeast
two-hybrid~assays, which allow researchers to identify direct physical
interactions between regulatory factors and their target genes~(Hawe~et
al., 2019).

Once the regulatory interactions have been experimentally validated,
computational methods are used to construct the GRN itself. These
methods typically involve the use of machine learning algorithms and
statistical models to identify patterns in the data and to infer the
underlying regulatory interactions. The constructed GRN is validated
using additional experimental data, such as perturbation experiments
that test the predictions made by the network~(Bonneau~et al., 2007).
This iterative process of experimental validation and computational
modeling allows researchers to refine their understanding of the
regulatory interactions within the microbial community and to develop
increasingly accurate models of the GRN.

It is worth noting that the process of constructing GRNs can be
challenging, particularly in complex microbial communities with many
interacting species. One major challenge is the issue of data sparsity,
where there may be limited data available for certain genes or proteins
within the community. This can make it difficult to accurately infer the
regulatory interactions between these factors and can lead to inaccurate
or incomplete models of the GRN~(Hecker~et al., 2009). Another challenge
is the issue of noise and variability in the experimental data, which
can make it difficult to distinguish true regulatory interactions from
random fluctuations in gene expression. This requires careful
experimental design and statistical analysis to ensure that the inferred
regulatory interactions are robust and reliable. Despite these
challenges, the construction of GRNs has proven to be a powerful tool
for understanding the regulatory interactions within microbial
communities, and for identifying key regulatory factors and pathways
involved in important ecological processes~(Trivedi~et al., 2021). By
providing a comprehensive picture of the regulatory landscape within
microbial communities, GRNs can help to guide the development of new
biotechnologies and sustainable solutions to environmental problems, and
ultimately help to unlock the full potential of microbial ecology.

The use of GRNs in microbial ecology offers both opportunities and
challenges. One major opportunity is the potential to gain a deeper
understanding of the regulatory interactions within microbial
communities, and to identify key genes and regulatory factors involved
in important ecological processes such as nutrient cycling and
bioremediation~(Kuramitsu~et al., 2007). This can help to guide the
development of new biotechnologies and sustainable solutions to
environmental problems, and ultimately contribute to a more sustainable
future. However, there are also significant challenges associated with
the use of GRNs in microbial ecology. One major challenge is the issue
of data sparsity, where there may be limited data available for certain
genes or proteins within the community~(L\selectlanguage{ngerman}ähnemann~et al., 2020). This
can make it difficult to accurately infer the regulatory interactions
between these~factors and~can lead to inaccurate or incomplete models of
the GRN.

Another challenge is the issue of noise and variability in the
experimental data, which can make it difficult to distinguish true
regulatory interactions from random fluctuations in gene
expression~(Chan~et al., 2017). This requires careful experimental
design and statistical analysis to ensure that the inferred regulatory
interactions are robust and reliable. There is also a need for more
sophisticated computational methods for the analysis of GRNs,
particularly in~complex microbial communities with many interacting
species. This requires the development of new algorithms and statistical
models that can handle large, high-dimensional datasets and account for
the complexity of microbial communities. Despite these challenges, the
use of GRNs in microbial ecology offers significant opportunities for
advancing our understanding of microbial communities and their
interactions with the environment. By providing a comprehensive picture
of the regulatory landscape within microbial communities, GRNs can help
to guide the development of new biotechnologies and sustainable
solutions to environmental problems, and ultimately contribute to a more
sustainable future.

\textbf{Case Studies}

These case studies demonstrate the potential of GRNs in microbial
ecology and beyond, highlighting the versatility and power of this
approach for understanding complex biological systems. By providing a
comprehensive view of the regulatory mechanisms involved in various
microbial processes, GRNs can guide the development of more efficient
and effective strategies for a range of applications, from
bioremediation to pathogenesis. As such, the use of GRNs is likely to
continue to expand in microbial ecology and other fields, helping to
shed light on the complex interactions and regulatory networks that
underlie the diverse array of microbial processes that are essential to
life on Earth.

\textbf{Case study 1: GRNs in nutrient cycling}

One example of the use of GRNs in microbial ecology is in understanding
nutrient cycling in soil microbial communities~(Wakelin~et al., 2007).
Soil microbial communities play a critical role in the cycling of
nutrients such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, which are essential
for plant growth and ecosystem function. Using a combination of
experimental and computational methods, researchers have constructed
GRNs to identify the regulatory factors involved in nutrient cycling in
soil microbial communities. For example, one study used RNA sequencing
and~ChIP-seq to identify the regulatory interactions between genes
involved in nitrogen cycling in a soil microbial community~(Mardis,
2008;~Castrillo~et al., 2017). The resulting GRN revealed a complex
network of regulatory interactions involving multiple transcription
factors andsignaling pathways, highlighting the intricate regulatory
mechanisms involved in nutrient cycling in soil microbial communities.

Another study used a combination of metagenomics, transcriptomics, and
proteomics to construct a GRN of the nitrogen-fixing bacterial community
in soil~(Sun~et al., 2018). The resulting network identified key
regulatory factors involved in nitrogen fixation, as well as potential
interactions between nitrogen fixation and other metabolic pathways in
the community. These studies demonstrate the power of GRNs in
understanding the regulatory mechanisms involved in nutrient cycling in
soil microbial communities, and in identifying key regulatory factors
that can be targeted for the development of new biotechnologies and
sustainable solutions to environmental problems. By providing a
comprehensive picture of the regulatory landscape within microbial
communities, GRNs can help to guide the development of more efficient
and sustainable agricultural practices, and ultimately contribute to a
more sustainable future.

\textbf{Case study 2: GRNs in bioremediation}

Another example of the use of GRNs in microbial ecology is in
bioremediation, which involves the use of microorganisms to degrade
pollutants and other contaminants in the environment. One study used a
combination of experimental and computational methods to construct a GRN
of a microbial community involved in the biodegradation of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are a common type of environmental
contaminant. The resulting network identified key regulatory factors
involved in the biodegradation of PAHs, as well as potential
interactions between the PAH degradation pathway and other metabolic
pathways in the community~(Alegbeleye~et al., 2017).

Another study used transcriptomics and computational methods to
construct a GRN of a microbial community involved in the bioremediation
of chlorinated ethenes, which are a common type of groundwater
contaminant. The resulting network revealed a complex regulatory network
involving multiple transcription factors and signaling~pathways
and~identified key regulatory factors that could be targeted for the
optimization of bioremediation strategies~(Karig, 2017). These studies
demonstrate the potential of GRNs in guiding the development of more
efficient and effective bioremediation strategies, by providing a
comprehensive picture of the regulatory mechanisms involved in pollutant
degradation in microbial communities. By understanding the complex
regulatory networks involved in bioremediation, researchers can identify
key regulatory factors that can be targeted to optimize bioremediation
strategies and improve environmental outcomes.

\textbf{Case study 3: GRNs in pathogenesis}

The use of GRNs is also becoming increasingly important in understanding
pathogenesis, or the mechanisms by which pathogenic microorganisms cause
disease. One study used a combination of transcriptomics, proteomics,
and computational methods to construct a GRN of a bacterial pathogen
involved in causing urinary tract infections. The resulting network
revealed a complex regulatory network involving multiple virulence
factors, as well as potential interactions with the host immune
response~(Subramanian~et al.,2015). This information could be used to
identify key regulatory factors that could be targeted for the
development of new antimicrobial therapies or vaccines.

Another study used a combination of transcriptomics and computational
methods to construct a GRN of a fungal pathogen involved in causing
invasive aspergillosis, a serious and often fatal disease in
immunocompromised individuals. The resulting network identified key
regulatory factors involved in the virulence of the fungus, as well as
potential interactions with the host immune response~(Retanal~et al.,
2021;~Yang~et al., 2015). This information could be used to identify new
targets for the development of antifungal therapies or immunotherapies.
These studies demonstrate the potential of GRNs in understanding the
complex regulatory networks involved in pathogenesis, and in identifying
new targets for the development of more effective treatments for
infectious diseases. By providing a comprehensive picture of the
regulatory landscape within pathogenic microorganisms, GRNs can help to
guide the development of more targeted and effective therapies,
ultimately improving patient outcomes and public health.

\textbf{Future Directions}

Recent advances in omics technologies, such as genomics,
transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have greatly expanded our
ability to study gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in microbial
ecology~(Kumar~et al., 2021). These high-throughput approaches allow for
the simultaneous measurement of thousands of molecular components,
providing a more comprehensive view of the regulatory landscape within
microbial communities. Furthermore, advances in data integration and
computational methods have allowed for the integration of omics data
with other types of data, such as environmental metadata and network
models, to construct more accurate and informative GRNs. For example,
machine learning approaches can be used to predict gene-gene
interactions from transcriptomics data, while network inference
algorithms can be used to infer regulatory relationships between genes
based on patterns of co-expression or co-regulation~(Mochida~et al.,
2018;~Ni~et al., 2016).

Integration of multiple omics data sets and other types of data has the
potential to uncover new regulatory mechanisms and relationships that
may not be apparent from any single data set alone~(Angelini~and~Costa,
2014). Additionally, the use of computational models and simulations can
allow for the prediction and testing of hypotheses about the behavior
and dynamics of GRNs, further expanding our understanding of microbial
ecology. The continued development of omics technologies and
computational methods is likely to continue to drive advances in our
understanding of gene regulatory networks in microbial ecology and other
fields, enabling new discoveries and applications in areas such as
biotechnology, bioremediation, and medicine.

In addition to advances in omics technologies and data integration, new
experimental and analytical techniques are also expanding our ability to
study gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in microbial ecology~(Hecker~et
al., 2009;~Lowe~et al., 2017). For example, single-cell sequencing and
imaging techniques can provide high-resolution snapshots of gene
expression and regulatory activity within individual cells, allowing for
the construction of more detailed and accurate GRNs. Furthermore, the
use of synthetic biology and genetic engineering approaches can allow
for the manipulation and control of specific genes and regulatory
elements within GRNs, enabling the testing and validation of hypotheses
about their functions and interactions~(Przybyla~and~Gilbert, 2022).
This can be particularly useful for studying complex, muli-step
processes such as nutrient cycling or bioremediation, where the
interactions between multiple genes and regulatory factors may be
difficult to tease apart using other approaches.

The development of new visualization and data analysis tools is allowing
for more intuitive and informative representation of GRNs, helping
researchers to better understand the complex regulatory interactions
involved in microbial processes~(Junker~et al., 2006). For example,
network visualization tools can be used to identify key regulatory nodes
or modules within GRNs, while pathway analysis tools can be used to
identify specific pathways or processes that are regulated by the
network. The continued development of new experimental and analytical
techniques, combined with advances in omics technologies and data
integration, is likely to further accelerate our ability to study gene
regulatory networks in microbial ecology, enabling new discoveries and
applications in a wide range of fields.

The study of GRNs in microbial ecology is a highly interdisciplinary
field, encompassing areas such as microbiology, genetics, computational
biology, and ecology.~As such, there are numerous opportunities for
collaboration and innovation that can help to drive advances in this
field. One area of potential collaboration is the integration of
multiple types of data, such as omics data, environmental metadata, and
ecological modeling, to construct more accurate and informative
GRNs~(Eloe-Fadrosh~et al., 2022). This can involve collaboration between
researchers with expertise in different areas, such as computational
biologists, microbiologists, and ecologists, to develop new approaches
and techniques for integrating and analyzing data.

Another area of potential collaboration is the development of new
experimental techniques and tools for studying GRNs, such as single-cell
sequencing and imaging, synthetic biology, and network visualization
tools~(Akers and~Murali,~2021;~Katebi~et al., 2021). Collaborations
between experimentalists and computational biologists can help to
identify new areas of research and develop new tools and approaches for
studying GRNs. Collaborations between academia and industry can help to
facilitate the translation of research findings into practical
applications, such as the development of new biotechnologies or
bioremediation strategies. Industry partnerships can provide funding,
resources, and expertise to help accelerate the translation of research
findings into real-world applications. The study of gene regulatory
networks in microbial ecology provides numerous opportunities for
collaboration and innovation, and continued collaboration between
researchers with diverse backgrounds and expertise is likely to drive
new discoveries and applications in this exciting and rapidly evolving
field.

As with any field of research, there are numerous challenges and
opportunities for future research in the study of GRNs in microbial
ecology. Here, we will highlight some of the key challenges and
opportunities in this field~(Thomas~and~Jin, 2014).~One major challenge
is the complexity and variability of microbial communities, which can
make it difficult to accurately reconstruct and analyze GRNs. This
challenge can be addressed through the development of new experimental
and computational approaches that can capture the dynamics and diversity
of microbial communities at high resolution. Another challenge is the
lack of standardized methods for constructing and analyzing GRNs, which
can make it difficult to compare and interpret results from different
studies. Addressing this challenge will require the development of
standardized protocols and best practices for GRN construction and
analysis, as well as the development of tools and resources for data
sharing and collaboration~(Derry~et al., 2010).

In addition to these challenges, there are numerous opportunities for
future research in this field. For example, advances in omics
technologies and data integration are likely to enable the construction
of more accurate and comprehensive GRNs, which can be used to better
understand the roles and interactions of individual genes and regulatory
factors in microbial processes~(Sevimoglu~and~Arga, 2014;~Van
Der~Wijst~et al., 2018). Furthermore, the application of GRNs in areas
such as biotechnology, bioremediation, and human health is likely to
provide new opportunities for innovation and impact. For example, the
use of GRNs in synthetic biology approaches could enable the design and
engineering of microbial communities with specific functions or
properties, while the application of GRNs in human microbiome research
could lead to new therapies or diagnostics for a wide range of diseases.
The study of gene~regulatory networks in microbial ecology is a rapidly
evolving field with numerous challenges and opportunities for future
research. Addressing these challenges and leveraging these opportunities
is likely to drive new discoveries and applications in this exciting
field.

\textbf{Conclusion}

GRNs have emerged as a powerful approach for understanding the
functional roles of individual genes and their interactions in complex
biological systems, including microbial communities. The use of GRNs in
microbial ecology has the potential to reveal the underlying genetic
architecture of microbial communities, identify key regulatory genes and
their targets, and uncover novel insights into microbial community
structure and function. The integration of GRNs with other omics
approaches and environmental metadata holds great promise in advancing
our understanding of microbial ecology and its relevance to human health
and environmental sustainability. Despite the many advantages of using
GRNs in microbial ecology, several challenges remain, including the need
for improved methods for data integration, network inference, and
validation. Furthermore, the interpretation of GRNs requires a detailed
understanding of the functional roles of individual genes and their
interactions, which can be challenging in complex microbial communities.
In summary, the study of microbial ecology through gene regulatory
networks represents an exciting and rapidly growing field that holds
significant promise for advancing our understanding of the complex
interactions between microorganisms and their environment. Continued
innovation and collaboration among researchers from diverse fields will
be essential in realizing the full potential of this approach in
addressing critical challenges in human health and environmental
sustainability.

\textbf{Conflict of interest statement}

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

\textbf{References}

\begin{enumerate}
\tightlist
\item
  Barton, L. L., \&~Northup, D. E. (2011).~\emph{Microbial ecology}.
  John Wiley \& Sons.
\item
  Arda, H. E., \&~Walhout, A. J. (2010).~Gene-centered regulatory
  networks.~\emph{Briefings in functional genomics},~\emph{9}(1), 4-12.
\item
  Hansen, T. F. (2006). The evolution of genetic
  architecture.~\emph{Annu. Rev. Ecol.~Evol. Syst.},~\emph{37}, 123-157.
\item
  Haque, S., Ahmad, J. S., Clark, N. M., Williams, C. M., \&~Sozzani, R.
  (2019). Computational prediction of gene regulatory networks in plant
  growth and development.~\emph{Current opinion in plant
  biology},~\emph{47}, 96-105.
\item
  Deng, Y., Jiang, Y. H., Yang, Y., He, Z., Luo, F., \& Zhou, J. (2012).
  Molecular ecological network analyses.~\emph{BMC
  bioinformatics},~\emph{13}, 1-20.
\item
  Martínez-Espinosa, R. M. (2020). Microorganisms and their metabolic
  capabilities in the context of the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle at
  extreme environments.~\emph{International journal of molecular
  sciences},~\emph{21}(12), 4228.
\item
  Berg, G.,~Köberl, M., Rybakova, D., Müller, H., Grosch, R., \&~Smalla,
  K. (2017). Plant microbial diversity is suggested as the key to future
  biocontrol and health trends.~\emph{FEMS microbiology
  ecology},~\emph{93}(5).
\item
  Abram, F. (2015). Systems-based approaches to unravel multi-species
  microbial community functioning.~\emph{Computational and structural
  biotechnology journal},~\emph{13}, 24-32.
\item
  Rastogi, G., \& Sani, R. K. (2011). Molecular techniques to assess
  microbial community structure, function, and dynamics in the
  environment.~\emph{Microbes and microbial technology: agricultural and
  environmental applications}, 29-57.
\item
  Reuter, J. A.,~Spacek, D. V., \& Snyder, M. P. (2015). High-throughput
  sequencing technologies.~\emph{Molecular cell},~\emph{58}(4), 586-597.
\item
  Wu, G.,~Fanzo, J., Miller, D. D.,~Pingali, P., Post, M., Steiner, J.
  L., \&~Thalacker\selectlanguage{english}-Mercer, A. E. (2014). Production and supply of
  high\selectlanguage{english}-quality food protein for human consumption: sustainability,
  challenges, and innovations.~\emph{Annals of the New York Academy of
  Sciences},~\emph{1321}(1), 1-19.
\item
  MacNeil, L. T., \&~Walhout, A. J. (2011).~Gene regulatory networks and
  the role of robustness and stochasticity in the control of gene
  expression.~\emph{Genome research},~\emph{21}(5), 645-657.
\item
  Erickson, B., \& Winters, P. (2012).~Perspective on opportunities in
  industrial biotechnology in renewable chemicals.~\emph{Biotechnology
  journal},~\emph{7}(2), 176-185.
\item
  Pande, V., Pandey, S. C., Sati, D., Pande, V., \&~Samant, M. (2020).
  Bioremediation: an emerging effective approach towards environment
  restoration.~\emph{Environmental Sustainability, 3,}~91-103.
\item
  Urem, M.,~\selectlanguage{polish}Ś\selectlanguage{english}wi\selectlanguage{polish}ą\selectlanguage{english}tek-Po\selectlanguage{polish}ł\selectlanguage{english}aty\selectlanguage{polish}ń\selectlanguage{english}ska, M. A., Rigali, S., \& van~Wezel, G. P.
  (2016). Intertwining nutrient-sensory networks and the control of
  antibiotic production in Streptomyces.~\emph{Molecular
  Microbiology},~\emph{102}(2), 183-195.
\item
  Epihov, D. Z.,~Saltonstall, K., Batterman, S. A., Hedin, L. O., Hall,
  J. S., van~Breugel, M., \ldots{} \&~Beerling, D. J. (2021).
  Legume--microbiome interactions unlock mineral nutrients in regrowing
  tropical forests.~\emph{Proceedings of the National Academy of
  Sciences},~\emph{118}(11), e2022241118.
\item
  Dombrowski, N.,~Donaho, J. A., Gutierrez, T., Seitz, K. W.,~Teske, A.
  P., \& Baker, B. J. (2016). Reconstructing metabolic pathways of
  hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from the Deepwater Horizon oil
  spill.~\emph{Nature microbiology},~\emph{1}(7), 1-7.
\item
  Mooshammer, M.,~Wanek, W.,~H\selectlanguage{ngerman}ämmerle, I.,~Fuchslueger, L.,~Hofhansl,
  F.,~Knoltsch, A., \ldots{} \& Richter, A. (2014). Adjustment of
  microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon: nitrogen
  imbalances~regulates~soil nitrogen cycling.~\emph{Nature
  communications},~\emph{5}(1), 3694.
\item
  Babu, M. M.,~Teichmann, S. A., \& Aravind, L. (2006). Evolutionary
  dynamics of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory
  networks.~\emph{Journal of molecular biology},~\emph{358}(2), 614-633.
\item
  Velvizhi, G., Goswami, C.,~Shetti, N. P., Ahmad, E., Pant, K. K.,
  \&~Aminabhavi, T. M. (2022).~Valorisation~of lignocellulosic biomass
  to value-added products: Paving the pathway towards low-carbon
  footprint.~\emph{Fuel},~\emph{313}, 122678.
\item
  Saraiva, J. P.,~Worrich, A.,~Karakoç, C.,~Kallies, R.,~Chatzinotas,
  A.,~Centler, F., \& Nunes da Rocha, U. (2021). Mining synergistic
  microbial interactions: a roadmap on how to integrate multi-omics
  data.~\emph{Microorganisms},~\emph{9}(4), 840.
\item
  Yarwood, J. M., McCormick, J. K., \&~Schlievert, P. M. (2001).
  Identification of a novel two-component regulatory system that acts in
  global regulation of virulence factors of Staphylococcus
  aureus.~\emph{Journal of bacteriology},~\emph{183}(4), 1113-1123.
\item
  Abraham, W. R., Nogales, B.,~Golyshin, P. N., Pieper, D. H.,
  \&~Timmis, K. N. (2002). Polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading microbial
  communities in soils and sediments.~\emph{Current opinion in
  microbiology},~\emph{5}(3), 246-253.
\item
  Kreikemeyer, B., McIver, K. S., \&~Podbielski, A. (2003). Virulence
  factor regulation and regulatory networks in Streptococcus pyogenes
  and their impact on pathogen--host interactions.~\emph{Trends in
  microbiology},~\emph{11}(5), 224-232.
\item
  Wallenstein, M. D., \& Hall, E. K. (2012). A trait-based framework for
  predicting when and where microbial adaptation to climate change will
  affect ecosystem functioning.~\emph{Biogeochemistry, 109,}~35-47.
\item
  Hawe, J. S., Theis, F. J., \&~Heinig, M. (2019). Inferring interaction
  networks from multi-omics data.~\emph{Frontiers in
  genetics},~\emph{10}, 535.
\item
  Bonneau, R.,~Facciotti, M. T., Reiss, D. J., Schmid, A. K., Pan, M.,
  Kaur, A., \ldots{} \&~Baliga, N. S. (2007). A predictive model for
  transcriptional control of physiology in a~free
  living~cell.~\emph{Cell},~\emph{131}(7), 1354-1365.
\item
  Hecker, M.,~Lambeck, S.,~Toepfer, S., Van~Someren, E., \&~Guthke, R.
  (2009). Gene regulatory network inference: data integration in dynamic
  models---a review.~\emph{Biosystems},~\emph{96}(1), 86-103.
\item
  Trivedi, P.,~Mattupalli, C., Eversole, K., \& Leach, J. E. (2021).
  Enabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement
  of microbiomes.~\emph{New Phytologist},~\emph{230}(6), 2129-2147.
\item
  Kuramitsu, H. K., He, X., Lux, R., Anderson, M. H., \& Shi, W. (2007).
  Interspecies interactions within oral microbial
  communities.~\emph{Microbiology and molecular biology
  reviews},~\emph{71}(4), 653-670.
\item
  Lähnemann, D.,~Köster, J.,~Szczurek, E., McCarthy, D. J., Hicks, S.
  C., Robinson, M. D., \ldots{} \&~Schönhuth, A. (2020). Eleven grand
  challenges in single-cell data science.~\emph{Genome
  biology},~\emph{21}(1), 1-35.
\item
  Chan, T. E., Stumpf, M. P., \&~Babtie, A. C. (2017). Gene regulatory
  network inference from single-cell data using multivariate information
  measures.~\emph{Cell systems},~\emph{5}(3), 251-267.
\item
  Wakelin, S. A.,~Colloff, M. J., Harvey, P. R.,~Marschner, P., Gregg,
  A. L., \& Rogers, S. L. (2007). The effects of stubble retention and
  nitrogen application on soil microbial community structure and
  functional gene abundance under irrigated maize.~\emph{FEMS
  microbiology ecology},~\emph{59}(3), 661-670.
\item
  Mardis, E. R. (2008). The impact of next-generation sequencing
  technology on genetics.~\emph{Trends in genetics},~\emph{24}(3),
  133-141.
\item
  Castrillo, G., Teixeira, P. J. P. L., Paredes, S. H., Law, T. F., De
  Lorenzo, L.,~Feltcher, M. E., \ldots{} \&~Dangl, J. L. (2017).
  Root~microbiota~drive direct integration of phosphate stress and
  immunity.~\emph{Nature},~\emph{543}(7646), 513-518.
\item
  Sun, W., Xiao, E.,~Ha\selectlanguage{english}ggblom, M.,~Krumins, V., Dong, Y., Sun, X.,
  \ldots{} \& Yan, B. (2018). Bacterial survival strategies in an
  alkaline tailing site and the physiological mechanisms of dominant
  phylotypes as revealed by metagenomic analyses.~\emph{Environmental
  science \& technology},~\emph{52}(22), 13370-13380.
\item
  Alegbeleye, O. O.,~Opeolu, B. O., \& Jackson, V. A. (2017). Polycyclic
  aromatic hydrocarbons: a critical review of environmental occurrence
  and bioremediation.~\emph{Environmental management},~\emph{60},
  758-783.
\item
  Karig, D. K. (2017). Cell-free synthetic biology for environmental
  sensing and remediation.~\emph{Current opinion in
  biotechnology},~\emph{45}, 69-75.
\item
  Subramanian, N.,~Torabi-Parizi, P., Gottschalk, R. A., Germain, R. N.,
  \& Dutta, B. (2015). Network representations of immune system
  complexity.~\emph{Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and
  Medicine},~\emph{7}(1), 13-38.
\item
  Retanal, C., Ball, B., \& Geddes-McAlister, J. (2021).
  Post-translational modifications drive success and failure of
  fungal--host interactions.~\emph{Journal of Fungi},~\emph{7}(2), 124.
\item
  Yang, Y. X., J~Ahammed, G., Wu, C., Fan, S. Y., \& Zhou, Y. H. (2015).
  Crosstalk among~jasmonate, salicylate and ethylene signaling pathways
  in plant disease and immune responses.~\emph{Current Protein and
  Peptide Science},~\emph{16}(5), 450-461.
\item
  Kumar, V., Singh, K., Shah, M. P., Singh, A. K., Kumar, A., \& Kumar,
  Y. (2021). Application of omics technologies for microbial community
  structure and function analysis in contaminated environment.
  In~\emph{Wastewater treatment}~(pp. 1-40). Elsevier.
\item
  Mochida, K.,~Koda, S., Inoue, K., \& Nishii, R. (2018). Statistical
  and machine learning approaches to predict gene regulatory networks
  from transcriptome datasets.~\emph{Frontiers in Plant
  Science},~\emph{9}, 1770.
\item
  Ni, Y.,~Aghamirzaie, D.,~Elmarakeby, H.,~Collakova, E., Li, S.,~Grene,
  R., \& Heath, L. S. (2016). A machine learning approach to predict
  gene regulatory networks in seed development in
  Arabidopsis.~\emph{Frontiers in plant science},~\emph{7}, 1936.
\item
  Angelini, C., \& Costa, V. (2014).~Understanding gene regulatory
  mechanisms by integrating~ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data: statistical
  solutions to biological problems.~\emph{Frontiers in cell and
  developmental biology},~\emph{2}, 51.
\item
  Lowe, E. K., Cuomo, C., \& Arnone, M. I. (2017). Omics approaches to
  study gene regulatory networks for development in
  echinoderms.~\emph{Briefings in Functional Genomics},~\emph{16}(5),
  299-308.
\item
  Przybyla, L., \& Gilbert, L. A. (2022).~A new era in functional
  genomics screens.~\emph{Nature Reviews Genetics},~\emph{23}(2),
  89-103.
\item
  Junker, B. H.,~Klukas, C., \& Schreiber, F. (2006). VANTED: a system
  for advanced data analysis and visualization in the context of
  biological networks.~\emph{BMC bioinformatics},~\emph{7}(1), 1-13.
\item
  Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A., Ahmed, F., Babinski, M.,~Baumes, J.,~Borkum,
  M.,~Bramer, L., \ldots{} \&~Fagnan, K. (2022). The National Microbiome
  Data Collaborative Data Portal: an integrated multi-omics microbiome
  data resource.~\emph{Nucleic Acids Research},~\emph{50}(D1),
  D828-D836.
\item
  Akers, K., \& Murali, T. M. (2021).~Gene regulatory network inference
  in single-cell biology.~\emph{Current Opinion in Systems
  Biology},~\emph{26}, 87-97.
\item
  Katebi, A., Ramirez, D., \& Lu, M. (2021). Computational
  systems-biology approaches for modeling gene networks driving
  epithelial--mesenchymal transitions.~\emph{Computational and systems
  oncology},~\emph{1}(2), e1021.
\item
  Thomas, S. A., \&~Jin, Y. (2014).~Reconstructing biological gene
  regulatory networks: where optimization meets big
  data.~\emph{Evolutionary Intelligence},~\emph{7}, 29-47.
\item
  Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F.,
  Goldman, R., \ldots{} \&~Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video
  research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis,
  technology, and ethics.~\emph{The journal of the learning
  sciences},~\emph{19}(1), 3-53.
\item
  Sevimoglu, T., \&~Arga, K. Y. (2014).~The role of protein interaction
  networks in systems biomedicine.~\emph{Computational and structural
  biotechnology journal},~\emph{11}(18), 22-27.
\item
  Van Der~Wijst, M. G., de Vries, D. H.,~Brugge, H.,~Westra, H. J., \&
  Franke, L. (2018). An integrative approach for building personalized
  gene regulatory networks for precision medicine.~\emph{Genome
  medicine},~\emph{10}(1), 1-15.
\end{enumerate}

\selectlanguage{english}
\FloatBarrier
\end{document}

