References

1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJ, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018; 392:1341-8.
2. Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World health report. 2010; 30:1-31.
3. Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O’Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PloS one. 2013; 8:e56583.
4. Crane JM, Murphy P, Burrage L, Hutchens D. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of extreme obesity in pregnancy. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC. 2013; 35:606-11.
5. Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, AITOKALLIO‐TALLBERG A, Uotila J, Raudaskoski T, ULANDER VM, et al. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2010; 89:896-902.
6. Pyykönen A, Gissler M, Løkkegaard E, Bergholt T, Rasmussen SC, Smárason A, et al. Cesarean section trends in the Nordic countries–a comparative analysis with the Robson classification. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017; 96:607-16.
7. Socialstyrelsen. Statistics on pregnancies, deliveries and newborn babies 2020. Sveriges Officiella Statistik,. 2021.
8. Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS medicine. 2018; 15:e1002494.
9. O’Neill SM, Kearney PM, Kenny LC, Khashan AS, Henriksen TB, Lutomski JE, et al. Caesarean delivery and subsequent stillbirth or miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e54588.
10. Moraitis A, Oliver‐Williams C, Wood A, Fleming M, Pell J, Smith G. Previous caesarean delivery and the risk of unexplained stillbirth: retrospective cohort study and meta‐analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology. 2015; 122:1467-74.
11. Williams CM, Asaolu I, Chavan NR, Williamson LH, Lewis AM, Beaven L, et al. Previous cesarean delivery associated with subsequent preterm birth in the United States. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2018; 229:88-93.
12. Zhang Y, Zhou J, Ma Y, Liu L, Xia Q, Fan D, et al. Mode of delivery and preterm birth in subsequent births: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019; 14:e0213784.
13. Moore B. Appropriate technology for birth. The Lancet. 1985; 326:787.
14. Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2016; 123:745-53.
15. Hug L, You D, Blencowe H, Mishra A, Wang Z, Fix MJ, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates and trends in stillbirths from 2000 to 2019: a systematic assessment. The Lancet. 2021; 398:772-85.
16. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, Ellwood D, Erwich JJ, Coory M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet (London, England). 2016; 387:691-702.
17. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The lancet. 2011; 377:1331-40.
18. Bjellmo S, Andersen GL, Hjelle S, Klungsøyr K, Krebs L, Lydersen S, et al. Does caesarean delivery in the first pregnancy increase the risk for adverse outcome in the second? A registry-based cohort study on first and second singleton births in Norway. BMJ open. 2020; 10:e037717.
19. Guise J-M, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstetrics Gynecology. 2010; 115:1267-78.
20. Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, Ekbom A. The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. European journal of epidemiology. 2009; 24:659-67.
21. Lamont K, Scott NW, Jones GT, Bhattacharya S. Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015; 350.
22. Gardosi J, Kady SM, McGeown P, Francis A, Tonks A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2005; 331:1113-7.
23. Porta M. A dictionary of epidemiology: Oxford university press; 2014.
24. Osborne C, Ecker JL, Gauvreau K, Lieberman E. First birth cesarean and risk of antepartum fetal death in a subsequent pregnancy. Journal of midwifery & women’s health. 2012; 57:12-7.
25. Kennare R, Tucker G, Heard A, Chan A. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2007; 109:270-6.
26. Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet (London, England). 2003; 362:1779-84.
27. O’Neill SM, Agerbo E, Kenny LC, Henriksen TB, Kearney PM, Greene RA, et al. Cesarean section and rate of subsequent stillbirth, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy: a Danish register-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014; 11:e1001670.
28. Castillo MC, Vwalika B, Stoner MCD, Chi BH, Stringer JSA, Kasaro M, et al. Risk of stillbirth among Zambian women with a prior cesarean delivery. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2018; 143:360-6.
29. Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Jama. 2002; 287:2684-90.
30. O’Neill SM, Agerbo E, Khashan AS, Kearney PM, Henriksen TB, Greene RA, et al. Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017; 17:74.
31. Torabi S, Sheikh M, Fattahi Masrour F, Shamshirsaz AA, Bateni ZH, Nassr AA, et al. Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in second pregnancy with previous elective cesarean section(). The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2019; 32:2221-7.
32. Cho GJ, Kim LY, Min KJ, Sung YN, Hong SC, Oh MJ, et al. Prior cesarean section is associated with increased preeclampsia risk in a subsequent pregnancy. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015; 15:24.
33. Mbah AK, Sharma PP, Alio AP, Fombo DW, Bruder K, Salihu HM. Previous cesarean section, gestational age at first delivery and subsequent risk of pre-eclampsia in obese mothers. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2012; 285:1375-81.
34. Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth: a comparison of 3 national guidelines. Obstetrical gynecological survey. 2018; 73:537-43.
35. Mittal S, Pardeshi S, Mayadeo N, Mane J. Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications. The Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology of India. 2014; 64:251-4.