References
1. Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, Forder P, Brand A, Hogg R, et al.
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal
Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I
Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA.
2017;317(12):1224–33. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.2068
2. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB,
Mannel RS, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to
laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of
uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol.
2012;30(7):695–700. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645.
3. Nobbenhuis MAE, Gul N, Barton-Smith P, O’Sullivan O, Moss E, Ind TEJ,
et al. Robotic surgery in gynaecology: Scientific Impact Paper No. 71
(July 2022). BJOG. 2022;130(1):e1-e8. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17242.
4. Melamud O, Eichel L, Turbow B, Shanberg A. Laparoscopic vesicovaginal
fistula repair with robotic reconstruction. Urology. 2005;65(1):163–6.
DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2004.09.052.
5. Ind T, Laios A, Hacking M, Nobbenhuis M. A comparison of operative
outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for
endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med
Robot. 2017;13(4):e1851. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1851.
6. Ind TEJ, Marshall C, Hacking M, Harris M, Bishop L, Barton D, et al.
Introducing robotic surgery into an endometrial cancer service–a
prospective evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in a UK
institution. Int J Med Robot. 2016;12(1):137–44. DOI:
10.1002/rcs.1651.
7. Wright JD, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Huang Y, Hu JC, et al.
Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for
Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1087–96. DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2015.65.3212.
8. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S.
Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via
traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(3):407–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022.
9. Tyan P, Amdur R, Berrigan M, Robinson H, Sparks A, Gu A, et al.
Differences in Postoperative Morbidity among Obese Patients Undergoing
Abdominal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications. J
Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):464–72. DOI:
10.1016/J.JMIG.2019.04.001.
10. Crosbie EJ, Kitson SJ, McAlpine JN, Mukhopadhyay A, Powell ME, Singh
N. Endometrial cancer. Lancet (London, England).
2022;399(10333):1412–28. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00323-3.
11. Baeten IGT, Hoogendam JP, Schreuder HWR, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM,
Verheijen RHM, Zweemer RP, et al. The influence of learning curve of
robot-assisted laparoscopy on oncological outcomes in early-stage
cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet
Gynaecol. 2021;128(3):563–71. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16399.
12. Holub Z, Jabor A, Bartoš P, Hendl J, Urbánek Š. Laparoscopic surgery
in women with endometrial cancer: The learning curve. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;107(2):195–200. DOI:
10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00373-1.
13. Ekdahl L, Wallin E, Alfonzo E, Reynisson P, Lönnerfors C,
Dahm-Kähler P, et al. Increased Institutional Surgical Experience in
Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Reduces Recurrence Rate: Results from a Nationwide Study. J Clin Med.
2020;9(11):3715. DOI: 0.3390/jcm9113715.
14. Eoh KJ, Lee J-Y, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim SW, Kim YT. The institutional
learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical
hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study. BMC
Cancer. 2020;20(1):152. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6660-7.
15. Larcher A, De Naeyer G, Turri F, Dell’Oglio P, Capitanio U, Collins
JW, et al. The ERUS Curriculum for Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy:
Structure Definition and Pilot Clinical Validation. Eur Urol.
2019;75(6):1023–31. DOI: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2019.02.031.
16. Rusch P, Ind T, Kimmig R, Maggioni A, Ponce J, Zanagnolo V, et al.
Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted
gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic
Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). Facts, Views Vis ObGyn. 2019
Mar;11(1):29. Https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822956/.
17. Ismail A, Wood M, Ind T, Gul N, Moss E. The development of a robotic
gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi
study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1186/S12909-020-1979-Y.
18. Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery. SERGS
Curriculum Pathway - SERGS . Available from:
https://www.sergs.org/sergs-education/sergs-curriculum-pathway/
[Assessed 10th of March 2023].
19. British and Irish Robotic Gynaecological Surgeons. BIARGS
TRAINING CURRICULUM.https://biargs.org.uk/biargs-training-curriculum/[Assessed
10th of March 2023].
20. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical
complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336
patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. DOI:
10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
21. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S,
et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with
endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12–39. DOI:
10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230.
22. Imboden S, Nastic D, Ghaderi M, Rydberg F, Siegenthaler F, Mueller
MD, et al. Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk
groups in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162(2):394–400. DOI:
10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.026.
23. Heymans M, Eekhout I. Applied Missing Data Analysis with SPSS
and (R) Studio. Amsterdam; 2019.
https://bookdown.org/mwheymans/bookmi/.
24. Mauger DT, Kauffman GL. Statistical Analysis—Specific Statistical
Tests: Indications for Use. Surg Res. 2001;1201–15. DOI:
10.1016/B978-012655330-7/50084-8.
25. Lapco Consultancy Ltd. LAPCO International - our programmes .
Available from:
https://www.lapco-international.com/consultancy/our-programmes/[Assessed
2023 Mar 16].
26. Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. Learning curve and surgical outcome for
robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched
controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of
endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(6):739–48. DOI:
10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.
27. Rajanbabu A, Patel V, Anandita A, Burde K, Appukuttan A. An analysis
of operating time over the years for robotic-assisted surgery in
gynecology and gynecologic oncology. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(2):215–9.
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01094-3.
28. Uwins C, Hablase R, Assalaarachchi H, Tailor A, Stewart A,
Chatterjee J, et al. Enhanced Recovery after Uterine Corpus Cancer
Surgery: A 10 Year Retrospective Cohort Study of Robotic Surgery in an
NHS Cancer Centre. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(21):5463. DOI:
10.3390/cancers14215463.
29. Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, Mäenpää
JU. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial
cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2016;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005.
30. Corrado G, Cutillo G, Pomati G, Mancini E, Sperduti I, Patrizi L, et
al. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to
laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial
cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(8):1074–81. DOI:
10.1016/J.EJSO.2015.04.020.
31. Diamand R, D’Hondt F, Mjaess G, Jabbour T, Dell’Oglio P, Larcher A,
et al. Teaching robotic cystectomy: Prospective pilot clinical
validation of the ERUS training Curriculum. BJU (Preprint) 2023. DOI:
10.1111/BJU.15993 [Accessed 15th of March 2023).