References
1. Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, Forder P, Brand A, Hogg R, et al. Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317(12):1224–33. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.2068
2. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(7):695–700. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645.
3. Nobbenhuis MAE, Gul N, Barton-Smith P, O’Sullivan O, Moss E, Ind TEJ, et al. Robotic surgery in gynaecology: Scientific Impact Paper No. 71 (July 2022). BJOG. 2022;130(1):e1-e8. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17242.
4. Melamud O, Eichel L, Turbow B, Shanberg A. Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction. Urology. 2005;65(1):163–6. DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2004.09.052.
5. Ind T, Laios A, Hacking M, Nobbenhuis M. A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(4):e1851. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1851.
6. Ind TEJ, Marshall C, Hacking M, Harris M, Bishop L, Barton D, et al. Introducing robotic surgery into an endometrial cancer service–a prospective evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in a UK institution. Int J Med Robot. 2016;12(1):137–44. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1651.
7. Wright JD, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Huang Y, Hu JC, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1087–96. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.3212.
8. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(3):407–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022.
9. Tyan P, Amdur R, Berrigan M, Robinson H, Sparks A, Gu A, et al. Differences in Postoperative Morbidity among Obese Patients Undergoing Abdominal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):464–72. DOI: 10.1016/J.JMIG.2019.04.001.
10. Crosbie EJ, Kitson SJ, McAlpine JN, Mukhopadhyay A, Powell ME, Singh N. Endometrial cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2022;399(10333):1412–28. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00323-3.
11. Baeten IGT, Hoogendam JP, Schreuder HWR, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Verheijen RHM, Zweemer RP, et al. The influence of learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopy on oncological outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;128(3):563–71. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16399.
12. Holub Z, Jabor A, Bartoš P, Hendl J, Urbánek Š. Laparoscopic surgery in women with endometrial cancer: The learning curve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;107(2):195–200. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00373-1.
13. Ekdahl L, Wallin E, Alfonzo E, Reynisson P, Lönnerfors C, Dahm-Kähler P, et al. Increased Institutional Surgical Experience in Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Reduces Recurrence Rate: Results from a Nationwide Study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3715. DOI: 0.3390/jcm9113715.
14. Eoh KJ, Lee J-Y, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim SW, Kim YT. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):152. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6660-7.
15. Larcher A, De Naeyer G, Turri F, Dell’Oglio P, Capitanio U, Collins JW, et al. The ERUS Curriculum for Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Structure Definition and Pilot Clinical Validation. Eur Urol. 2019;75(6):1023–31. DOI: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2019.02.031.
16. Rusch P, Ind T, Kimmig R, Maggioni A, Ponce J, Zanagnolo V, et al. Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). Facts, Views Vis ObGyn. 2019 Mar;11(1):29. Https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822956/.
17. Ismail A, Wood M, Ind T, Gul N, Moss E. The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1186/S12909-020-1979-Y.
18. Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery. SERGS Curriculum Pathway - SERGS . Available from: https://www.sergs.org/sergs-education/sergs-curriculum-pathway/ [Assessed 10th of March 2023].
19. British and Irish Robotic Gynaecological Surgeons. BIARGS TRAINING CURRICULUM.https://biargs.org.uk/biargs-training-curriculum/[Assessed 10th of March 2023].
20. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
21. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12–39. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230.
22. Imboden S, Nastic D, Ghaderi M, Rydberg F, Siegenthaler F, Mueller MD, et al. Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162(2):394–400. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.026.
23. Heymans M, Eekhout I. Applied Missing Data Analysis with SPSS and (R) Studio. Amsterdam; 2019. https://bookdown.org/mwheymans/bookmi/.
24. Mauger DT, Kauffman GL. Statistical Analysis—Specific Statistical Tests: Indications for Use. Surg Res. 2001;1201–15. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012655330-7/50084-8.
25. Lapco Consultancy Ltd. LAPCO International - our programmes . Available from: https://www.lapco-international.com/consultancy/our-programmes/[Assessed 2023 Mar 16].
26. Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(6):739–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.
27. Rajanbabu A, Patel V, Anandita A, Burde K, Appukuttan A. An analysis of operating time over the years for robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology and gynecologic oncology. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(2):215–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01094-3.
28. Uwins C, Hablase R, Assalaarachchi H, Tailor A, Stewart A, Chatterjee J, et al. Enhanced Recovery after Uterine Corpus Cancer Surgery: A 10 Year Retrospective Cohort Study of Robotic Surgery in an NHS Cancer Centre. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(21):5463. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215463.
29. Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, Mäenpää JU. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005.
30. Corrado G, Cutillo G, Pomati G, Mancini E, Sperduti I, Patrizi L, et al. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(8):1074–81. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJSO.2015.04.020.
31. Diamand R, D’Hondt F, Mjaess G, Jabbour T, Dell’Oglio P, Larcher A, et al. Teaching robotic cystectomy: Prospective pilot clinical validation of the ERUS training Curriculum. BJU (Preprint) 2023. DOI: 10.1111/BJU.15993 [Accessed 15th of March 2023).