Reference
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A,
et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence
and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J
Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338.
2. Berti FCB, Salviano-Silva A, Beckert HC, de Oliveira KB, Cipolla GA,
Malheiros D. From squamous intraepithelial lesions to cervical cancer:
Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers in cervical
carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019
Dec;1872(2):188306. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
PMID: 31398380.
3. Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Kehar R, Gandhi S, Chen Y, et
al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of
cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016
Mar;132(3):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
PMID: 26643302.
4. Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, Kyrgiou M, Tzafetas M, Ghaem-Maghami
S, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of
treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol.
2017 Dec;18(12):1665-1679. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30700-3. Epub 2017
Nov 7. PMID: 29126708.
5. Murakami I, Ohno A, Ikeda M, Yamashita H, Mikami M, Kobayashi Y, et
al. Analysis of pathological and clinical characteristics of cervical
conization according to age group in Japan. Heliyon. 2020 Oct
8;6(10):e05193. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05193. PMID: 33088958;
PMCID: PMC7560578.
6. Ikeda M, Mikami M, Yasaka M, Enomoto T, Kobayashi Y, Nagase S, et al.
Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive
margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective
study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and
Gynecology. J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(5):e68. doi:
10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e68. Epub 2021 May 10. PMID: 34132067; PMCID:
PMC8362807.
7. Alder S, Megyessi D, Sundström K, Östensson E, Mints M, Belkić K, et
al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a
predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study. Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):172.e1-172.e12. doi:
10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.042. Epub 2019 Aug 29. PMID: 31473226.
8. Dou Y, Zhang X, Li Y, Wang F, Xie X, Wang X. Triage for management of
cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with
positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis. Front Med. 2017
Jun;11(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0517-8. Epub 2017 May 10.
PMID: 28488232.
9. Murta EF, Silva AO, Silva EA. Clinical significance of a negative
loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol.
2006;27(1):50-2. PMID: 16550969.
10. Koc N, Sahin D, Ayas S. Reevaluation of negative cone biopsy results
after a positive cervical biopsy finding. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013
Apr;17(2):154-9. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825c33f9. PMID: 23519286.
11. Jun Zhang, Jing Yang, Yan Zhang, Xing Li, Yaqin Peng, Yu Zhangl.
Research progress on the related factors and treatment of positive
margin after cervical conization. Chinese Journal of Reproduction and
Contraception. 2019;(11):930-936.
doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2916.2019.11.013
12. Bae HS, Chung YW, Kim T, Lee KW, Song JY. The appropriate cone depth
to avoid endocervical margin involvement is dependent on age and disease
severity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Feb;92(2):185-92. doi:
10.1111/aogs.12025. Epub 2012 Dec 5. PMID: 23034067.
13. Nam KH, Kwon JY, Kim YH, Park YW. Pregnancy outcome after cervical
conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of
prophylactic cerclage. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Dec 30;21(4):225-9. doi:
10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.225. Epub 2010 Dec 31. PMID: 21278883; PMCID:
PMC3026300.
14. Zhao C, Liu J, Li MZ,Zhao Y, Bi H, Sui L, Wei LH. Practices for
cervical conization. Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstertrics and
Gynecology. 22.02(2021):218-219.
doi:10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2021.02.042.
15. Mikami M, Ikeda M, Sato H, Iwase H, Enomoto T, Kobayashi Y, et al.
The use of conization to identify and treat severe lesions among
prediagnosed CIN1 and 2 patients in Japan. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018
Jul;29(4):e46. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e46. Epub 2018 Mar 8. PMID:
29770617; PMCID: PMC5981098.
16. Papoutsis D, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S, Sotiropoulou M, Antsaklis A.
Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after
large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
2013;75(3):163-8. doi: 10.1159/000345864. Epub 2012 Dec 28. PMID:
23296191.
17. Kawano K, Tsuda N, Nishio S, Yonemoto K, Tasaki K, Tasaki R, et al.
Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin
in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016
Sep;27(5):e54. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e54. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PMID:
27401478; PMCID: PMC4944020.