References
Anderson, MJ, 2001. A new method for
non‐parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral ecology. 26,
32–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x.
Anderson, MJ, 2004. PERMANOVA 2factor: a FORTRAN computer program for
permutational multivariate analysis of variance using permutation
tests. University of Auckland, Auckland.
Andreani, TL, Bastos, RP, Dias, TM, Prado, CPA, Morais, AR, 2021.
Acoustic variability among male gladiator frogs, Boana goiana(Lutz, 1968) (Anura: Hylidae): an 18-year analysis across several
reproductive seasons. Amphibia-Reptilia. 42:43-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10029
Barber, JR., Crooks, KR, Fristrup, KM, 2010. The costs of chronic noise
exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 25,
180–189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002.
Bastos, RP., Alcantara, B, Morais, AR, Lingnau, R, Signorelli. L, 2011.
Vocal behaviour and conspecific call response in Scinax
centralis . Herpetological Journal, 21, 43–50.
Bastos, RP, Haddad CFB, 2002. Acoustic and aggressive interactions inScinax rizibilis (Anura: Hylidae) during the reproductive
activity in southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 23, 97–104.
Bermúdez-Cuamatzin, E, Ríos-Chélen, A, Gil, D, Garcia, CM, 2009.
Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch:
syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? Behaviour. 146,
1269–1286, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853909X423104.
Bertoluci, J, Brassaloti, RA, Júnior, JWR, Vilela, VMF, Sawakuchi, HO,
2007. Species composition and similarities among anuran assemblages of
forest sites in southeastern brazil. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba). 64,
364–374, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162007000400007.
Bittencourt, L, Barbosa, M, Secchi, E, Lailson-Brito, J, Azevedo, A,
2016. Acoustic habitat of an oceanic archipelago in the Southwestern
Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 115,
103–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.06.001.
Bosch, J, De La Riva, I, 2004. Are frog calls modulated by the
environment? An analysis with anuran species from Bolivia. Canadian
Journal of Zoology. 82, 880–888, https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-060.
Caldart, VM, Iop, S, Lingnau, R, Cechin, SZ, 2016. Communication in a
noisy environment: short-term acoustic adjustments and the underlying
acoustic niche of a Neotropical stream-breeding frog. Acta Ethologica.
19, 151–162, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-016-0235-2.
Carr, L.W., Fahrig, L., 2001. Effect of road traffic on two amphibian
species of differing vagility. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1071–1078,
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041071.x.
Caorsi, VZ, Both, C, Cechin, S, Antunes, R, Borges-Martins, M, 2017.
Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two Neotropical
hylid frogs. PLoS ONE. 12, 1–14,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197632.
Cruz, D., Marciano-jr, E, Napoli, MF, 2014. Advertisement and courtship
calls of Phyllodytes wuchereri (Peters, 1873) (Anura: Hylidae).
Zootaxa. 3774, 97–100, https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3774.1.8.
Cunnington, GM, Fahrig, L, 2010. Plasticity in the vocalizations of
anurans in response to traffic noise. Acta Oecologica. 36, 463–470,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.06.002.
Desrochers, L, Proulx, R, 2017. Acoustic masking of soniferous species
of the St-Lawrence lowlands. Landscape and Urban Planning. 168, 31–37,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.015.
Eterovick, PC, 2008. Use and sharing of calling and retreat sites byPhyllodytes luteolus in a modified environment. Journal of
Herpetology. 33, 17–22, https://doi.org/10.2307/1565538.
Ey, E, Fischer, J, 2009. The “Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis” - A
review of the evidence from Birds, Anurans and Mammals. Journal of
Bioacoustics. February 21–48,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2009.9753613.
Ferreira, RB, Schineider, JAP, Teixeira, RL, 2012. Diet, fecundity, and
use of Bromeliads by Phyllodytes luteolus (Anura: Hylidae) in
Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Herpetology. 46, 19–24,
https://doi.org/10.1670/09-040.
Forti, LR, Becker, G, Tacioli, L, Pereira, VR, Santos, AC, Oliveira, I,
Haddad, CFB, Toledo, LF, 2017. Perspectives on invasive amphibians in
Brazil. PLoS ONE. 12, 1–22,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184703.
Friedl, TWP, 2006. Individual male calling pattern and male mating
success in the European Treefrog (Hyla arborea ): Is there
evidence for directional or stabilizing selection on male calling
behaviour? Ethology, 112, 116–126.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01132.x
Furtado, R, Santos, S, Dias, TM, Bastos, RP, Nomura, F, 2016. Vocal
repertoire during reproductive and aggressive contexts of three
Brazilian Tree Frogs: Bokermannohyla sapiranga, Hypsiboas
albopunctatus and H. Goianus (Anura: Hylidae). South American Journal
of Herpetology. 11, 136–147,
https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-16-00002.1.
Gambale, PG, Bastos, RP, 2014. Vocal repertoire and bioacoustic analyses
in Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from southern
Brazil. Herpetological Journal, 24, 31–39.
Gerhardt, HC, Tanner, SD, Corrigan, CM, Walton, H, 2000. Female
preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog
(Hyla versicolor ). Behavioral Ecology. 11, 663–669,
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.6.663.
Gerhardt, HC, Huber, F, 2002 Acoustic communication in insects and
anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. 1. ed. Chicago:
University Of Chicago Press.
Gingras, B, Boeckle, M, Herbst, CT, Fitch WT, 2013. Call acoustics
reflect body size across four clades of anurans. Journal of Zoology.
289, 143–150, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00973.x.
Gomes, L, Solé, M, Sousa-Lima, RS, Baumgarten, JE, 2022. Influence of
anthropogenic sounds on insect , anuran and bird acoustic signals : A
Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 10, 1–10,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.827440.
Goutte, S, Dubois, A, Howard, SD, Márquez, R, Rowley, JJL, Dehling, J.
M., Grandcolas, P., Xiong, R. C., Legendre, F. 2018. How the environment
shapes animal signals : a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in
frogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 31, 148–158,
https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13210.
Grenat, PR, Pollo, FE, Ferrero, MA, Martino, AL, 2019. Differential and
additive effects of natural biotic and anthropogenic noise on call
properties of Odontophrynus americanus (Anura, Odontophryinidae):
Implications for the conservation of anurans inhabiting noisy
environments. Ecological Indicators. 99, 67–73,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.014.
Guerra, V, Llusia, D, Gambale, PG, Morais, AR, Márquez, R, Bastos, RP,
2018. The advertisement calls of Brazilian anurans: Historical review,
current knowledge and future directions. PLoS ONE. 13, 1–22,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191691.
Halfwerk, W, Lea, AM, Guerra, MA, Page, RA, Ryan, MJ, 2016. Vocal
responses to noise reveal the presence of the Lombard effect in a frog.
Behavioral Ecology. 27, 669–676,
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv204.
Hanna, DEL, Wilson, DR, Blouin-Demers, G, Mennill, DJ, 2014. Spring
peepers Pseudacris crucifer modify their call structure in
response to noise. Current Zoology. 60, 438–448,
https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/60.4.438.
Herrera-Montes, MI, Aide, TM, 2011. Impacts of traffic noise on anuran
and bird communities. Urban Ecosystems. 4, 15–427,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0158-7.
Hoskin, CJ, Goosem, MW, 2016. Road impacts on abundance, call traits,
and body size of Rainforest Frogs in Northeast Australia. Ecology and
Society. 15, 15,
DOI: 10.5751/ES-03272-150315.
Kaiser, K, Hammers, JL, 2009. The effect of anthropogenic noise on male
advertisement call rate in the neotropical treefrog, Dendropsophus
triangulum . Behaviour. 146, 1053–1069,
https://doi.org/10.1163/156853909X404457.
Kight, CR, Swaddle, JP, 2011. How and why environmental noise impacts
animals: An integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters. 04,
1052–1061, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x.
Kime, NM, Turner, WR, Ryan, MJ, 2000. The transmission of advertisement
calls in Central American frogs. Behavioral Ecology. 11, 1–83,
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.1.71.
Köhler, J, Jansen, M, Rodríguez, A, Kok, PJR, Toledo, LF, Emmerich, M,
Glaw, F, Haddad, CFB, Rodel, MO, Vences, M, 2017. The use of
bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: Theory, terminology, methods and
recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa. 4251, 1-124,
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1.
Legett, HD, Madden, RP, Aihara, I, Bernal, XE, 2020. Traffic noise
differentially impacts call types in a Japanese treefrog
(Buergeria japonica ). Ethology. 126, 76–583,
https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13009.
Lengagne, T, 2008. Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a
breeding anuran, Hyla arborea . Biological Conservation. 141,
2023–2031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.017.
Leon, E, Peltzer, PM, Lorenzon, R, Lajmanovich, RC, Beltzer, AH, 2019.
Effect of traffic noise on Scinax nasicus advertisement call
(Amphibia, Anura). Ilheringia. 109, 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019007.
Machado, RA, Bernarde, PS, Morato, SAA, Anjos, L, 1999. Análise
comparada da riqueza de anuros entre duas áreas com diferentes estados
de conservação no município de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil (Amphibia,
Anura). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 16, 997–1004,
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751999000400009..
Mageski, MM, Ferreira, RB, Beard, KH, Costa, LC, Jesus, PR, Medeiros,
CC, Ferreira, PD, 2016. Bromeliad selection by Phyllodytes
luteolus (Anura, Hylidae): the influence of plant structure and water
quality factors. Journal of Herpetology. 50, 108–112,
https://doi.org/10.1670/14-166.
Melcón, ML, Cummins, AJ, Kerosky, SM, Roche, LK, Wiggins, SM,
Hildebrand, JÁ. 2012. Blue whales respond to anthropogenic noise. PLoS
ONE. 7, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032681.
Moore, SE, Clarke, JT, 2002. Potential impact of offshore human
activities on gray whales. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 4, 9–25.
Morais, AR, Batista, VG, Gambale, PG, Signorelli, L, Bastos, RP, 2012.
Acoustic communication in a Neotropical frog (Dendropsophus
minutus ): vocal repertoire, variability and individual discrimination.
Herpetological Journal. 22, 249-257.
Morton, E. S. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. 1975. The
American Naturalist, 109, 17–34.
Parris, KM, Velik-Lord, M, North, JMA, 2009. Frogs call at a higher
pitch in traffic noise. Ecology and Society. 14, 15,
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art25/.
Penna, M, Solís, R, 1998. Frog call intensities and sound propagation
iin the South American temperate forest region. Behavioral Ecology and
Sociobiology. 42, 371–381, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050452.
Peixoto, O. L., 1995. Associação de anuros a bromeliáceas na Mata
Atlântica. Revista Universidade Rural: Série Ciências da Vida.
Seropédica 17: 75-83
R Core Team, 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Available from: http://www. R-project.org/.
Sabagh, LT, Ferreira, RB, Rocha, CFD, 2017. Host bromeliads and their
associated frog species: further considerations on the importance of
species interactions for conservation. Symbiosis. 73, 201–211,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-017-0500-9.
Salinas, A. S., Costa, RN, Orrico, VGD, Solé, M, 2018.
Tadpoles of the bromeliad-dwelling
frog Phyllodytes luteolus are able to prey on mosquito larvae.
Ethology Ecology & Evolution. 30, 85–496,
https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1438518.
Salles, ROL, Silva-Soares, T, 2010. Phyllodytes luteolus (Anura,
Hylidae) as an Alien Species in the Rio de Janeiro municipality, State
of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil. Herpetology Notes. 3, 57–258.
Simon, JE, Gasparini, JL, 2003. Descrição da vocalização dePhyllodytes kautskyi Peixoto e Cruz, 1988
(Amphibia,Anura,Hylidae). Biologia, 1988, 7–54.
Slabbekoorn, H, Ripmeester, EAP, 2008. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise:
Implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology. 17,
72–8, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03487.x.
Solé, M., Loebmann, D. 2017. Disgusting or delicious? Predatory behavior
of the hylid frog Phyllodytes luteolus on sympatric ants.
Ilheringia, Série Zoologia. 107.
DOI:
10.1590/1678-4766e2017030.
Stocker, M. 2002. Fish, mollusks and other sea animals’ use of sound,
and the impact of anthropogenic noise in the marine acoustic
environment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 112,
2431–2431.
Sun, JWC, Narins, PM, 2005. Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect
amphibian call rate. Biological Conservation. 121, 419–427,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017.
Toledo, LF, Martins, IA, Bruschi, DP, Passos, MA, Alexandre, C, Haddad,
CFB, 2015. The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context.
Acta Ethologica, 18, 87–99,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0194-4.
Toledo, LF, Carvalho-e-Silva, SP, Sánchez, C, Almeida, MA, Haddad, CFB,
2010. A revisão do Código Florestal Brasileiro: impactos negativos para
a conservação dos anfíbios. Biota Neotrop. 10, 35–38,
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000400003.
Troïanowski, M, Mondy, N, Dumet, A, Arcanjo, C, Lengnage, T, 2017.
Effects of traffic noise on tree frog stress levels, immunity, and color
signaling. Conservation Biology. 31, 132–1140,
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12893.
Warren, P. S., Katti, M, Ermann, M, Brazel, A, 2006. Urban bioacoustics:
It’s not just noise. Animal Behaviour. 71, 491–502,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.014.
Wells, K. D. 2007. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians, The
University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.
Wells, KD, Schwartz, JJ, 2006. The behavioral ecology of Anuran
communication. In: Narins, PM. et al. (Eds.). Hearing and sound
communication in Amphibians. New York: Springer Handbook of Auditory
Research, 44–86.
Wollerman, L, Wiley, RH, 2002. Background noise from a natural chorus
alters female discrimination of male calls in a neotropical frog. Animal
Behaviour. 63, 15–22, https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1885.
Yi, YZ, Sheridan, JA, 2019. Effects of traffic noise on vocalisations of
the rhacophorid tree frog Kurixalus chaseni (Anura:
Rhacophoridae) in Borneo. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 67, 77–8,
DOI:
10.26107/RBZ-2019-0007.
Zhao, L, Sun, X, Chen, Q, Yang, Y, Wang, J, Ran, J, Brauth, SE, Tang, Y,
Cui, J, 2018 Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response
to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog.
Ecology and Evolution. 8, 11733–11741,
Zhao, L, Wang, T, Guo, R, Zhai, X, Zhou, L, Cui, J, Wang, J, 2021.
Differential effect of aircraft noise on the spectral-temporal acoustic
characteristics of frog species. Animal Behaviour. 182, 9–18, DOI:
10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.09.014.
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, NJ, Saveliev, AA, Smith, GM, 2009. Mixed
effects models and extensions in ecology with R (Vol. 574). New York:
Springer.