Table 4 Linear discriminant function analysis was used to predict group membership (”EBP,” ”FDR,” and ”HC”) (”EBP,” and ”HC”) (”FDR,” and ”HC”) and (”EBP,” and ”FDR”).
Entry method Wilks’ Λ X2 p Value Correct classification of original grouped cases (%) Group membership prediction (%) Group membership prediction (%) Group membership prediction (%)
EBP (n=81) FDR (n=81) HC (n=81)
Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC
Composite 0.506 162.237 <0.001 65.4% 64.2% 81.5% 50.6%
NSS Motor coordination
0.820
47.516
<0.001
50.6%
46.9%
30.9
74.1
Neurocognitive performance information processing speed, verbal learning, working memory
0.548
143.823
<0.001
62.6%
63.6%
44.4%
80.2%
Separate the two groups of EBP and HC Separate the two groups of EBP and HC Separate the two groups of EBP and HC Separate the two groups of EBP and HC Separate the two groups of EBP and HC Separate the two groups of EBP and HC Separate the two groups of EBP and HC Separate the two groups of EBP and HC
Composite 0.436 131.158 <0.001 88.3% 87.7% 88.9%
NSS Motor coordination
0.764
42.917
<0.001
69.1%
56.8%
81.5%
Neurocognitive performance Information processing speed, verbal learning, working memory
0.473
118.678
<0.001
85.8%
85.2%
86.4%
Separate the two groups of FDR and HC Separate the two groups of FDR and HC Separate the two groups of FDR and HC Separate the two groups of FDR and HC Separate the two groups of FDR and HC Separate the two groups of FDR and HC Separate the two groups of FDR and HC Separate the two groups of FDR and HC
Composite 0.610 78.163 <0.001 81.5% 84.0% 68.0%
NSS Motor coordination
0.893
160.000
<0.001
64.8%
55.6%
74.1%
Neurocognitive performance Information processing speed, Verbal learning, Working memory
0.644
69.840
<0.001
80.2%
79%
81.5%
Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR
Composite 0.884 19.612 <0.001 62.3% 58% 66.7%
NSS Motor coordination
0.936
160.000
0.01
61.2%
46.9%
75.3%
Neurocognitive performance Information processing speed, Verbal learning, Working memory
0.931
160.000
0.01
60.5%
56.8%
64.2%
To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables.