Entry method | Wilks’ Λ | X2 | p Value | Correct classification of original grouped cases (%) | Group membership prediction (%) | Group membership prediction (%) | Group membership prediction (%) |
EBP (n=81) | FDR (n=81) | HC (n=81) | |||||
Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC | Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC | Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC | Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC | Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC | Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC | Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC | Separate the three groups of EBP, FDR and HC |
Composite | 0.506 | 162.237 | <0.001 | 65.4% | 64.2% | 81.5% | 50.6% |
NSS Motor coordination |
0.820
|
47.516
|
<0.001
|
50.6%
|
46.9%
|
30.9
|
74.1
|
Neurocognitive performance information processing speed, verbal learning, working memory |
0.548
|
143.823
|
<0.001
|
62.6%
|
63.6%
|
44.4%
|
80.2%
|
Separate the two groups of EBP and HC | Separate the two groups of EBP and HC | Separate the two groups of EBP and HC | Separate the two groups of EBP and HC | Separate the two groups of EBP and HC | Separate the two groups of EBP and HC | Separate the two groups of EBP and HC | Separate the two groups of EBP and HC |
Composite | 0.436 | 131.158 | <0.001 | 88.3% | 87.7% | 88.9% | |
NSS Motor coordination |
0.764
|
42.917
|
<0.001
|
69.1%
|
56.8%
|
81.5%
|
|
Neurocognitive performance Information processing speed, verbal learning, working memory |
0.473
|
118.678
|
<0.001
|
85.8%
|
85.2%
|
86.4%
|
|
Separate the two groups of FDR and HC | Separate the two groups of FDR and HC | Separate the two groups of FDR and HC | Separate the two groups of FDR and HC | Separate the two groups of FDR and HC | Separate the two groups of FDR and HC | Separate the two groups of FDR and HC | Separate the two groups of FDR and HC |
Composite | 0.610 | 78.163 | <0.001 | 81.5% | 84.0% | 68.0% | |
NSS Motor coordination |
0.893
|
160.000
|
<0.001
|
64.8%
|
55.6%
|
74.1%
|
|
Neurocognitive performance Information processing speed, Verbal learning, Working memory |
0.644
|
69.840
|
<0.001
|
80.2%
|
79%
|
81.5%
|
|
Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR | Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR | Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR | Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR | Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR | Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR | Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR | Separate the two groups of EBP and FDR |
Composite | 0.884 | 19.612 | <0.001 | 62.3% | 58% | 66.7% | |
NSS Motor coordination |
0.936
|
160.000
|
0.01
|
61.2%
|
46.9%
|
75.3%
|
|
Neurocognitive performance Information processing speed, Verbal learning, Working memory |
0.931
|
160.000
|
0.01
|
60.5%
|
56.8%
|
64.2%
|
|
To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. | To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. | To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. | To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. | To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. | To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. | To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. | To identify the groups, the NSS and neurocognitive performance were combined, and then the NSS and neurocognitive performance were used independently to predict the groups. Motor coordination in NSS, information processing speed, verbal learning and working memory in neurocognitive function were used as predictor variables. |