Figure S2. (a) The uncertainties in Tc of PZ
(gray area) resulting from the uncertainties in its saturation vapor
pressure p0 . The dash line represents the
results using p0 values recommended by Ge et
al.3 The lower and upper boundaries of the gray area
were derived by increasing and decreasing the vapor pressure by a factor
of 3.56, respectively. (b) The differences in Tcfor MA, DMA, EA and DEA when using Henry’s law constantKH (hallow markers) and the extrapolated vapor
pressure p0 at 298 K (solid markers). The
extrapolated vapor pressures were based on their Antoine Equations at
low temperatures.5 (c) The uncertainties inTc of DMA (gray area) resulting from the
uncertainties in its Henry’s law constant KH at
298 K. The dash line represents the results using theKH at 298 K value recommended by Linstrom and
Mallard.5 The lower and upper boundaries of the gray
area were derived by using the minimum and maximumKH at 298 K values (with clearly stated methods
of determination) in Sander,6 respectively. (d) The
comparison in Tc values of PZ using different
activity estimation methods. The black solid line was calculated with
the UNIFAC method and the red dash line was based on Raoult’s law.