Abstract
Introduction: Policies
that allow directly citing motorists for seat-belt non-use (primary
enforcement) have been shown to reduce motor vehicle crash deaths
relative to secondary enforcement, but the evidence base is dated
and does not account for recent improvements in vehicle designs and
road safety. The purpose of our study was to test whether recent upgrades
to primary enforcement still reduce motor vehicle crash deaths.
Methods: We used motor
vehicle crash death data from the Fatal Analysis Reporting System
for 2001-2014, and calculated rates using both person- and exposure-based
denominators. We used a difference-in-differences design to estimate
the effect of primary enforcement on death rates. We estimated negative
binomial regression models controlling for age, substance use involvement,
fixed state characteristics, secular trends, state median household
income, and other state-level traffic safety policies (blood alcohol
laws, speed limits).
Results: Models adjusted
only for crash characteristics and state-level covariates models showed
a protective effect of primary enforcement (Rate Ratio [RR]=0.88,
95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.98; Rate Difference [RD]=
-1.44 deaths per 100,000 population, 95%CI -2.78 to -0.11). After
adjustment for fixed state characteristics and secular trends there
was no evidence of an effect of upgrading from secondary to primary
enforcement in the whole population (RR=0.99, 95%CI: 0.93 to 1.05;
RD=-0.11, 95%CI: -1.01, 0.80) or for any age group.
Conclusion: Upgrading
to primary enforcement no longer appears protective for motor vehicle
crash death rates.