Validity, sensitivity and specificity of a measure of medication
adherence measure
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the properties of the measurement of the Global
Evaluation of Medication Adherence Instrument (GEMA) among patients with
chronic diseases. Methods: A methodological study was conducted in
public hospital of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The adherence to
anticoagulants as well as the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was
assessed on 127 patients. Besides GEMA, two other instruments were used
to assess adherence: the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale–8 (MMAS-8)
and the Measurement of Adhesion to Treatments (MAT). Results: The GEMA
presented a satisfactory level of specificity (0.76) to identify
adherents among those with a stable INR, low sensitivity (0.43) for the
identification of non-adherents among those with an unstable INR, and a
Positive Predictive Value of 0.70. Positive and weak to moderate
correlations were observed between the proportion of doses assessed with
GEMA and the scores on the MMAS-8 (r=0.26 and r=0.22, respectively) and
the MAT (r=0.22 and r=0.30, respectively). Conclusion: The GEMA
presented good practicality, acceptability, and evidence of specificity
regarding the stability of the INR. The validity of the construct was
partially supported by the relationship with self - reported measures of
adherence.