The ambition remains insufficient at 95%, as highlighted by Frankham (Frankham 2022), who showed that essentially no genetic diversity (specifically, heterozygosity) can be lost, e.g. 100% must be maintained. Still, percentage commitment may be problematic for two reasons. First genetic diversity can be assessed with numerous metrics (Ne, allelic richness, heterozygosity, adaptive genetic variance) and each declines at different rates. Heterozygosity is the most common metric, but allelic richness declines much faster. Second, regardless of the metric, a percentage is hard to monitor as only few thousand species globally have any population genetic data (DNA data from individuals across geographic space), and perhaps only a few dozen species globally have regular temporal DNA assessments. Most countries simply cannot accurately report percentage of genetic diversity maintained, directly.