This note discusses trying to detect a generic gravitational wave with an unknown waveform emitted from a particular sky position in data from two separate gravitational wave detectors. We define two slightly different approaches to this problem.

First we will define the gravitational wave signal at one timestamp, \(i\), observed in one detector, \(L\). We envisage two possible methods for this analysis with slightly different model definitions. The first uses

\begin{equation} \label{eq:signal1}h_{i}^{L}=h_{0}\left({A_{+}}_{i}{F_{+}}_{i}^{L}(\psi_{i})+{A_{\times}}_{i}{F_{\times}}_{i}^{L}(\psi_{i})\right),\\ \end{equation}where \({A_{+}}_{i}\) and \({A_{\times}}_{i}\) are the signal amplitudes scale factors (which could be positive or negative) in the plus and cross
polarisations at timestamp \(i\) (which would be the same for different detectors), \({F_{+}}_{i}^{L}(\psi_{i})\) and \({F_{\times}}_{i}^{L}(\psi_{i})\) are the
detector’s antenna response to the plus and cross polarisations for a given polarisation angle
\(\psi_{i}\)^{1}^{1}Note that \(\psi\) could change between data points, so this is also indexed for the current timestamp., and \(h_{0}\) is an overall underlying gravitational wave amplitude. The second uses

where, in this case, the \({A_{+}}_{i}\) and \({A_{\times}}_{i}\) are the actual signal amplitudes in the plus and cross polarisations at timestamp \(i\).

Here we will examine the details of the first method, which uses the signal model defined in Equation \ref{eq:signal1}.

Now, if we had one data point for detector \(X\), \(d_{i}^{X}\), and assuming the noise in the detector is Gaussian with zero mean and standard deviation of \(\sigma_{i}^{X}\), then the likelihood for the data given the model is

\begin{equation} \label{eq:singlelikelihood}p(d_{i}^{X}|h_{0},{A_{+}}_{i},{A_{\times}}_{i},\psi,I)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma_{i}^{X}}\exp{\left(-\frac{(d_{i}^{X}-h_{i}^{X})^{2}}{2{\sigma_{i}^{X}}^{2}}\right)}.\\ \end{equation}We now add another detector, \(Y\), with data point \(d_{i}^{Y}\), where the \(i\) timestamp index in detector \(Y\) is actually indexing a time that is shifted with respect to that in detector \(X\) based on the time delay between detectors for the known signal position. So, e.g. \(t_{i}^{Y}=t_{i}^{X}+\Delta t_{i}(\alpha,\delta)\). This gives a joint likelihood of the data for the two detectors of

\begin{equation} \label{eq:jointlikelihood}p(\{d_{i}^{X},d_{i}^{Y}\}|h_{0},{A_{+}}_{i},{A_{\times}}_{i},\psi_{i},I)=\frac{1}{2\pi\sigma_{i}^{X}\sigma_{i}^{Y}}\exp{\left(-\sum_{L=X,Y}\frac{(d_{i}^{L}-h_{i}^{L})^{2}}{2{\sigma_{i}^{L}}^{2}}\right)}.\\ \end{equation}We would like to get a posterior probability distribution on \(h_{0}\) alone (and in fact we also want the evidence marginalised over \(h_{0}\) too). If we assume that the \(A\) scale factors and \(\psi\) change on the timescale of individual data points then we want to marginalise over them for each point, e.g.

\begin{align} p(\{d_{i}^{X},d_{i}^{Y}\}|h_{0},I)= & \int_{{A_{+}}_{i}}\int_{{A_{\times}}_{i}}\int_{0}^{\pi}p(\{d_{i}^{X},d_{i}^{Y}\}|h_{0},{A_{+}}_{i},{A_{\times}}_{i},\psi_{i},I)\times\notag \\ & \label{eq:h0likelihood} p({A_{+}}_{i}|I)p({A_{\times}}_{i}|I)p(\psi_{i}|I){\rm d}{A_{+}}_{i}{\rm d}{A_{\times}}_{i}{\rm d}\psi_{i},\\ \end{align}where \(p({A_{+}}_{i}|I)\) and \(p({A_{\times}}_{i}|I)\) are the priors on the scale factors and \(p(\psi_{i}|I)\) is the prior on \(\psi_{i}\).

To get the joint likelihood over all the data we can just use the product of Equation \ref{eq:h0likelihood}, such that we have

\begin{equation} \label{eq:fulljoint}p(\{\vec{d}^{X},\vec{d}^{Y}\}|h_{0},I)=\prod_{i=1}^{N}p(\{d_{i}^{X},d_{i}^{Y}\}|h_{0},I),\\ \end{equation}where \(N\) is the total number of data

## Share on Social Media