\documentclass[10pt]{article}

\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\usepackage[section]{placeins}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{breakcites}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{hyphenat}





\PassOptionsToPackage{hyphens}{url}
\usepackage[colorlinks = true,
            linkcolor = blue,
            urlcolor  = blue,
            citecolor = blue,
            anchorcolor = blue]{hyperref}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\makeatletter
\patchcmd\@combinedblfloats{\box\@outputbox}{\unvbox\@outputbox}{}{%
  \errmessage{\noexpand\@combinedblfloats could not be patched}%
}%
\makeatother


\usepackage[round]{natbib}
\let\cite\citep




\renewenvironment{abstract}
  {{\bfseries\noindent{\abstractname}\par\nobreak}\footnotesize}
  {\bigskip}

\titlespacing{\section}{0pt}{*3}{*1}
\titlespacing{\subsection}{0pt}{*2}{*0.5}
\titlespacing{\subsubsection}{0pt}{*1.5}{0pt}


\usepackage{authblk}


\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[space]{grffile}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{booktabs,array,multirow}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amssymb}
\providecommand\citet{\cite}
\providecommand\citep{\cite}
\providecommand\citealt{\cite}
% You can conditionalize code for latexml or normal latex using this.
\newif\iflatexml\latexmlfalse
\providecommand{\tightlist}{\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}}%

\AtBeginDocument{\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.PDF,.eps,.EPS,.png,.PNG,.tif,.TIF,.jpg,.JPG,.jpeg,.JPEG}}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}










\begin{document}

\title{Points for inclusion}



\author[1]{Tom Day Goodacre}%
\author[2]{Bruce Marsh}%
\author[2]{Liam Gaffney}%
\author[1]{liam.gaffney}%
\author[2]{Fedosseev}%
\affil[1]{Affiliation not available}%
\affil[2]{European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)}%


\vspace{-1em}



  
  \date{May 26, 2024}


\begingroup
\let\center\flushleft
\let\endcenter\endflushleft
\maketitle
\endgroup








\sloppy


\textbf{1.~~~~~~ What's interesting about the region, phenomena,
motivation for the experiment?~}

{~~~~~~~~~~~~Spectacular exhibition of shape coexistence~ ~}

~~~~~~~~~~~~Point of cessation an open question for \textgreater{}40
years, numerous techniques have been applied in an attempt to these
isotopes. Gamma ray spectroscopy indicated the disappearance of the
coexisting ~~~~~~~~~~~~prolate minima, however, without direct
measurements of the ground state it was not possible to determine the
point at which the phenomena stops.

\textbf{2.~~~~~~ How were we able to do this now?}

~~~~~~~~~~~If there is a method summary in the main text then this could
maybe be merged with it:

~~~~~~~~~~~Yields have not changed significantly in the last 40 years
(\cite{Ravn_1979}, \cite{Lettry_1997}) therefore our sensitivity has
had to improve. We employed the technique of in-source resonance
ionization ~~~~~~~~~~~spectroscopy (\cite{Marsh_2013}).~

~~~~~~~~~~~Summary of the experimental method:~

\begin{quote}
\begin{quote}
\begin{quote}
\begin{itemize}
\tightlist
\item
  Production: CERN-ISOLDE
\item
  Laser spectroscopy: RILIS
\item
  Detection: Windmill, MR-ToF MS, Faraday cups
\end{itemize}
\end{quote}
\end{quote}
\end{quote}

~~~~~~~~~~~A new multi-photon stepwise resonance ionization scheme
(\cite{Day_Goodacre_2017}) and~{laser-atom interaction
region~}\protect\hyperlink{_msocom_1}{{[}TDG1{]}}~(\cite{Day_Goodacre_2016})
were~ developed to enable this technique to be applied for
~~~~~~~~~~~exotic mercury isotopes produced by a molten lead target. In
this way it was possible to study exotic isotopes with~{experimental
yields 7 orders of magnitude lower than the previously achieved for
~~~~~~~~~~~mercury (note: yield at limit of previous measurements:
\textgreater{}1E\^{}(6) /s (Raven 1979), yield at limit of our
measurements \textless{}1E\^{}(-1)
/s).}\protect\hyperlink{_msocom_2}{{[}TDG2{]}}~

\textbf{3.~~~~~~ What is new from the experimental results?}

~~~~~~~~~~~~The results are the first direct ground state measurements
below A=181. They demonstrate that the odd even staggering ceases at
A=180. The results also demonstrate a steady reduction in deformation
~~~~~~~~~~~~with decreasing N (also fitting well with the ``back in
shape idea''). The measured magnetic moments are applicable in the
interpretation\ldots{}

\textbf{4.~~~~~~ How does this compare to what was already known?}

~~~~~~~~~~~~Could be discussed here or as part of point 1.

\textbf{5.~~~~~~ How do the MCSM results complement/aid with the
interpretation of the experimental results?}

~~~~~~~~~~~Similarly to previous theoretical calculations, the MCSM
calculations are unable to predict whether or not the odd-even shape
staggering will stop at 180 or 178, it requires the experimentally
measured ~~~~~~~~~~~~magnetic moment to identify the correct eigenstate.
It could be good to keep/emphasize the fact that they were undertaken to
interpret the experimental results and that input from the experimental
~~~~~~~~~~~~results is required for the to determine the correct
eigenstates.~

~~~~~~~~~~~~The experimentally measured magnetic moments inform the
calculations, which are then in turn used to interpret/understand the
experimentally measured isotope shifts. The symbiosis you mentioned
~~~~~~~~~~~~is a nice way to bind the two parts of the paper together.
For me, the experimental results that should be the core focus of the
paper with the MCSM calculations presented as a way to understand and
~~~~~~~~~~~~interpret them. We know (hopefully) our results are correct,
the calculations are successful in that they can reproduce/help us
interpret and understand them.

\textbf{6.~~~~~~ What is new/novel/groundbreaking theoretically, how
does it compare to other calculations?}

~~~~~~~~~~~~Provides a new method of interpreting the phenomena data.
When combined with the experimentally measured magnetic moments, they
are able to reproduce the phenomena. Size of the simulation?

~\protect\hyperlink{_msoanchor_1}{{[}TDG1{]}}This is maybe a bit of a
stretch since this was not what drove this development

~\protect\hyperlink{_msoanchor_2}{{[}TDG2{]}}This one's a bit difficult,
our yields were terrible because the target operation was screwed up and
then later the Windmill was misalligned. I used ``experimental'' rather
than ``maximum'' yields to try and get around this. I think it's
\textasciitilde{} 6 orders of magnitude if we're looking at maximum
observed yields.~

~

~

\selectlanguage{english}
\FloatBarrier
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\bibliography{bibliography/converted_to_latex.bib%
}

\end{document}

