Figure 2: (a) PLE spectral map of MoSe2 with the
excitation energy ranging from 2.3eV to 2.75eV. Lorentz fitting results
of (a): PL intensity (c), PL peak energy and PL linewidth (d) are
summarized as a function of excitation energy. (c), (d) are further
divided into two regions based on the PL intensity. (b) The PL linewidth
and PL energy peak (determined by Lorentz fitting) as a function of
excitation intensity. The inset shows the 2D map of excitation intensity
dependent PL spectra. The excitation-intensity-dependent PL is measured
under an excitation of 2.33eV at 15K.
Figure 2 summarize our PLE and excitation-intensity-dependent PL data.
The excitation energy ranging from 2.3eV to 2.75eV is set far beyond the
A and B exciton energies to avoid resonant absorption. The excitation
intensity is kept below \(100\mu W\) to minimize the local heating. The
PL intensity across the excitation range primarily results from the
corresponding excitation intensity profile (blue ball in Fig.2(c)) and
the absorption coefficient (details in SI). At region I, the PL
intensity decreases as the excitation energy increases primarily owing
to the reduction of laser intensity (blue balls in Fig.2(c)). At region
II, the PL intensity remains unchanged relatively and even slightly
increases though the excitation intensity reduces with the increase
energy, which may result from the boosted absorption in C band (more
details in SI). The energy shift of A-1s exciton shows a
consistent trend with PL intensity or exciton density, which also agrees
well with our excitation intensity dependent PL result (Fig.2(b)). In
Fig.2(b), the A-1s peak energy undergoes a slight redshift with
the increase of exciton density under the excitation of 2.33eV
accompanying with the linewidth broadening, which is consistent to the
previous results 31. The redshift is attributed to the
bandgap renormalization and Coulomb screening effect. Usually, as the
excitation intensity increases, the electronic bandgap decreases owing
to the bandgap renormalization from photocarriers 32,
33, 34, 35, whereas the Coulomb screening effect is enhanced owing to
the increased exciton density, leading to the decrease of the exciton
binding energy, and consequently results in the PL peak energy blueshift35. In monolayer MoSe2, the bandgap
renormalization effect is larger than the Coulomb screening effect and
therefore the PL peak undergoes a redshift as a function of excitation
intensity. Figure 2(d) indicates that the excitation energy plays a more
prominent role at low exciton density. Usually, a low-intensity
excitation leads to narrower exciton PL linewidth on account of the less
Auger-like exciton-exciton interaction26, 36 as
elaborated in Fig.2(b). In region I, although the PL intensity or
exciton density monotonically decreases with the increasing excitation
energy, the PL linewidth almost linearly increases. It seems
contradictory to our excitation intensity dependent PL results
(Fig.2(b)) if only the exciton density induced linewidth variation is
taken in account. We attribute this linewidth broadening to the
acoustic-phonon assisted photoluminescence which we elaborate in the
following section. In region II, the PL intensity remains flat and the
acoustic-phonon assisted photoluminescence plays a solely role in
broadening the linewidth. Hence, the PL linewidth in region II increases
faster than in region I (the two red lines in Fig.2(d)). Meanwhile, the
Raman scattering is exploited to monitor the lattice temperature under
the excitation (\(\text{below\ }100\mu W\)), showing that the local
heating is negligible and the local lattice temperature remains a
constant in the excitation range (details in SI). The anomalous
linewidth broadening in both regions I and II and the non-Lorentzian
line shape of PL spectra are then attributed to the effective exciton
temperature rise which activates the acoustic-phonon assisted
photoluminescence process as demonstrated in Fig.3.